I apologize if there is an easy solution to this problem but I have searched this forum to no avail. I am trying to optimize our new Discourse forum for SEO, and it seems that multiple pages containing duplicate content can be accessed at different URLs, thus hurting search engine ranking by “splitt…

An example of 2 URLs with duplicate content are: http://forum.learntomod.com/c/uncategorized/l/latest?category_id=1&page=1 and http://forum.learntomod.com/c/uncategorized

Thankyou so much! Glad to hear an update is in the works.

Implemented via https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/3235#issuecomment-75987533

Confirmed it looks good, in https://meta.discourse.org/c/support/l/latest I see <link href="https://meta.discourse.org/c/support" rel="canonical" />

I have seen that the platform have a few seo navigation and crawl issues. Here are the problems Point 1. You’ve implemented rel=‘next’/‘prev’ but not as a meta tag but as a item prop. You’ve put in canonical only in Topics but not properly in Categories. https://meta.discourse.org/c/feature & http…

Everything is implemented correctly per Google Webmaster guides. This was already covered in previous topics. https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/1663744?hl=en Please cite specific words and sentences that are not being correctly met there, on that page. Searchers commonly prefer to vie…

Jeff, What you say is right, but the problem is that there is no “VIEW ALL” page in discourse forums. I am citing examples of even this forum. Let us take Feature category, the URI is https://meta.discourse.org/c/feature and if you look at it through user-agent as Googlebot/Bingbot/Slurp! you can …

Okay, so here’s the problem: Category pages have incorrect canonical: the page parameter is not included.

What you’re saying is that there is no canonical possible in this case. The better solution, if that’s true, is to not render it at all. http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2013/04/5-common-mistakes-with-relcanonical.html Mistake 1: rel=canonical to the first page of a paginated series Im…

Adding Canonical Redirects for SEO Optimization

Product Support

eviltrout (Robin Ward) 29. September 2015 um 21:24 21

Follow a discussion with Sam on this I’ve reverted this commit so we can rethink and do it properly.

Thema		Antworten	Aufrufe
Google indexing same page multiple times: Issue with canonicals Product Support	7	1713	18. Oktober 2019
Removing the /2, /3, /4, etc links for each reply within a topic URL Development seo	33	4672	13. Oktober 2024
?page= sometimes redirects to a page with a different canonical URL Bug	2	799	19. Oktober 2020
Negative SEO because of too much category pages getting indexed Product Support	8	1831	3. Juli 2017
Search engines now blocked from indexing non-canonical pages Announcements seo	23	4804	15. März 2022

Adding Canonical Redirects for SEO Optimization

Verwandte Themen