New documentation plugin in development

[tvavrda (Tomas Vavrda)]

@fredrikj

I suppose using meta.discourse.org as an issue tracker gives the project an opportunity for “dogfooding” Discourse. And all other issue trackers have their own faults, so it’s a pain having to choose one. But to me Discourse - while being excellent as a forum for questions and discussions - is very lacking as an issue tracker.

We use Discourse as an issue tracker. Better said – I try to force my team to use Discourse as an issue tracker And a wiki, and a forum, and a documentation… I suspect CDCK team to have another “secret” Discourse site where they track their stuff internally, using some interesting plug-ins, no-one has…

No matter how good the issue tracker is here, the community cannot be compared to anything else I know. In the end it’s the people who develop the software, not the technology behind it. And they rock!

And I like the documentation plugin a lot.

Now with all my praise, would it be possible to approve my PR?