Amazon onebox issue

For some reason, the onebox doesn’t actually fill anything out
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00H4SSB02

Doesn’t appear limited to just .com either:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00H4SSB02

Edit: It seems the Amazon side is working OK:

4 个赞

Hmm. Testing full link (for a different product):

Stripping parameters:

Stripping ref:

huh. it seems to be something about the onebox information for that product.

2 个赞

http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/193435659X

Test…

I think I fixed it for most of the products.

https://github.com/discourse/onebox/pull/304

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00H4SSB02 seems to be a special case.

7 个赞

Just a thought: It would be nice if this code also matched the smile.amazon.com domain (the rest of the URL is always the same) which allows non-profits to get a cut of the revenue.

8 个赞

Submit a PR to expand the URL matching:

Is there a reason we try to scrape using mobile pages from Amazon? The desktop pages contains a description meta tag that we can use to improve reliability and avoid breaking Amazon onebox everytime they change their HTML.

1 个赞

The idea was that mobile would have less cruft to sort through, if desktop is easier, go for it.

嗯,描述 meta 标签写得不错,但我不确定“在 Amazon.com 上。符合条件的商品免运费”这部分是否过于分散注意力。想听听您的看法 :smiley_cat:

嗯,我尝试在 meta 标签中使用描述,但感觉它更像是一则广告,而不是提供更多关于产品的信息。

我还是坚持使用移动端页面吧。

cc/ @sam

4 个赞

Have we pulled in the updated onebox @eviltrout?

I just bumped it. I can’t say for sure if we were on the latest because our gemfile referenced a version that was pushed to Rubygems that wasn’t also set in our repo. I can confirm that now we are on the very latest onebox code.

2 个赞

Test again:

Looks like this bug isn’t fixed, or we still aren’t deploying the latest version of onebox.

The PR hasn’t been merged yet :wink:

https://github.com/discourse/onebox/pull/304

Ok can we please merge that @neil? And merge in onebox version update too.

1 个赞

I think it is working now at last, thank you very much @tgxworld!

3 个赞

This is done now.

4 个赞