Nope. Alt is kind of more important to give users a bit better chances when searching images, but filename is the important one, but the most important thing is to use right context, ”this an apple: <image of apple named apple.jpg, alt is apple>.
Alt text is very useful for those using screenreaders - including people who are blind or partially sighted. But ideally it is text which describes what is being shown. It’s an accessibility issue. (I can’t think of a simple way to do that annotation - one of the image-oriented software services might do it.)
Yes, this has popped up before. To me the accessibility argument is far more important than the SEO one.
When you dump an image in a post and give it no description, blind people reading the forum are at a great disadvantage. They lose extremely important context.
AI can help bit here and provide automatic titles. I would say it performs okish, but has plenty of gaps.
As an opening move I recommend creating a theme component .
force users to provide titles on images
When enabled and you post anything and forget to enter a title for your images we could prompt you with a intermediary bootbox that reminds you to add titles to your images.
Of course it is. Well, more or less the argument is anything else than SEO.
I have two blind friends. Both are saying same all the time: the issue is not alt itself, but lack of quality alt-text, plus using alt everywhere all the time on images without any content — and here I see really big issues when webmasters get AI that starts generate alt-texts.
And… the main issue for screen readers is bad design of platform, and there the team has done quite good job.
