Just a quick (positive) real-world note after moving to the newer MathJax (v4.1) integration in Discourse Math.
One quality-of-life improvement I’ve noticed is that MathJax now gives very specific, localised feedback when input is invalid or a macro isn’t defined:
- It still renders the surrounding valid structure correctly (e.g.
\frac{...}{...}, parentheses, etc.) - But it leaves the unrecognised command visible literally (e.g. showing
\sincas text) rather than failing the entire expression or producing a confusing partial error.
In practice, this makes it immediately obvious what needs fixing, without obscuring what’s already correct — which is especially helpful in teaching contexts and when iterating on math-heavy posts.
For example, rather than relying on \sinc being defined, the robust approach is to write it explicitly as an operator:
with:
Overall this “render what you can, show the rest clearly” behaviour feels like a big usability win compared to older / less transparent failure modes. Thanks to everyone involved in the MathJax upgrade work.