Hello. We are currently receiving this message in our Google Search Console. I’m not entirely sure what it signifies. Could I get more clarity on this issue? Is there a solution? Additionally, I would like to mention that we have tried using multiple themes for the platform, but the same error persi…

[imagen] Arpit Jalan: The issue described in first post plus some other issues has been fixed in this commit: https://github.com/discourse/discourse/commit/d9ca6c3bb90c15d32b3f2ece1709522be65fb690https://github.com/discourse/discourse/commit/d9ca6c3bb90c15d32b3f2ece1709522be65fb690 Thanks for …

[imagen] Ayke: Do not include the data/text of the first post on subsequent pages, but always add itemprop="url" pointing to the first page: Yes, we’re doing that now per the recent commit but even after adding that we’re missing some required fields (author, datePublished, text) for subseque…

Thanks for the fix on mainEntityOfPage-property. And nice find on meta-tag vs. link-tag :+1: <link itemprop='url' content='<%= @topic_view.absolute_url %>'> Even better: <link itemprop='url' href='<%= @topic_view.absolute_url %>'> See: – This link is old, but YouTube still uses <link itemprop=…

Let me write some pseudocode for the current check that is displayed in Search Console. I think that will help a lot on these threads. I could send you the ShEx or SHACL but those are much less human readable. if not (IsDeletedContent() OR IsExternalContent()) then if not ("text" OR "a…

Thanks for the context and tips, Ryan! [imagen] Ryan Levering: Can you just throw meta elements in there with that data? I wasn’t worried about those fields as much with regards to bloating the page with redundant data. This is done. The metadata for subsequent pages (page 2 and onwards) loo…

Does adding the author URL while it’s path is blocked by our default robots.txt still makes sense? Should we remove the block from robots.txt now that we promote those URLs?

Please leave the URL there even if it’s blocked. You can discuss whether that makes sense or not for your forum use cases but even with the crawl blocked it can help with disambiguation.

[imagen] Falco: URL while it’s path is blocked by our default robots.txt That is still just a polite request, and not even Google respect it everytime. For example links in gmail lets googlebot there right away and enough visits leads to indexing and search results. Plus… we/you don’t know h…

Now the attribute datePublished for DiscussionForumPosting on first page diverts from datePublished on page=2+! first page: 2015-07-05T22:02:58Z page=2+: 2015-07-05T22:02:57Z I don’t think Google trusts diverting data and thereby might decide that those two urls contain different DiscussionFor…

Hide post “Closed x days ago” from crawler view If a topic is closed there is a special post added to the topic: E.g. see Google structured data for forums and profile pages - #15 [grafik] Of course this post has no an empty text attribute. See validator.schema.org for …/t/-/286762 → last commen…

Mejoras en el esquema del foro de discusión

Soporte

Falco (Falco) 3 Enero, 2024 14:41 25

¿Sigue teniendo sentido añadir la URL del author mientras su ruta está bloqueada por nuestro robots.txt predeterminado? ¿Deberíamos eliminar el bloqueo del robots.txt ahora que promocionamos esas URL?

Applying Schema.org on the user profile page for improved author authority on Google

Tema		Respuestas	Vistas
Google Structured Data -- Invalid Article Schema Support	44	8838	9 Noviembre 2018
Different schema type for Topics and Posts Feature	16	3870	1 Enero 2024
Google structured data for forums and profile pages Feature seo	14	1714	1 Enero 2024
Removing the /2, /3, /4, etc links for each reply within a topic URL Development seo	33	4231	13 Octubre 2024
Search console "author" field missing: (+1,000% increase Bug	7	530	3 Abril 2024

Mejoras en el esquema del foro de discusión

Temas relacionados