Getting this error a lot in Sidekiq (Retries and Dead lists):
Jobs::HandledExceptionWrapper: Wrapped ActiveRecord::RangeError: PG::NumericValueOutOfRange: ERROR: integer out of range
The jobs I’ve noticed this identical error for are:
Jobs::PostAlert
Jobs::ProcessPost
Jobs::NotifyCategoryChange
This was discussed a bit in the past here: Feedback on the new Review Queue - #250 by markersocial
Can you please run:
cd /var/discourse/
./launcher enter app
su postgres
psql
\x
\connect discourse
SELECT id FROM notifications ORDER BY 1 DESC LIMIT 1;
\q
exit
Thanks @Falco, I just ran it now. Here is the result:
-[ RECORD 1 ]--
id | 2147483496
Okay, so it’s the famous integer max problem. We need to move to bigint to fix this. I will take a look into this.
For now your workaround is to run:
cd /var/discourse/
./launcher enter app
su postgres
psql
\x
\connect discourse
ALTER TABLE notifications ALTER COLUMN id SET DATA TYPE bigint
\q
exit
This is the default for new installs but old installs have the wrong data type.
Running the workaround may be hard cause it will block the table, you many need to shed your web load first.
Thanks @Falco & @sam - appreciate it 
Regarding the workaround, this should be relatively safe to do? Not worried about down time, just breaking something.
It’s using the standard app.yml single container. For shedding the web load, do you think using read-only mode and running ./launcher stop app, ./launcher start app prior to doing the workaround probably suffice?
It will not break anything, worst case is that it will just be “stuck” for a very long time.
Thanks Sam, I did the workaround. Though, did not get any feedback upon inputting:
ALTER TABLE notifications ALTER COLUMN id SET DATA TYPE bigint
Not sure if it’s still processing perhaps. Currently getting the same error (in the /sidekiq dead list, for last retry ‘just now’ jobs) for:
Jobs::PostAlert
Jobs::ProcessPost
Jobs::NotifyCategoryChange
Looks like you need to run in with post_id column as well
Thanks!
Just to be sure, does this look correct?
ALTER TABLE notifications ALTER COLUMN post_id SET DATA TYPE bigint
Yes that should be safe, once we add an official migration it will allow for it
Perfect, thanks
I ran that (no confirmation/feedback received, like the previous one). Forum didn’t slow down, so not sure if it worked. Getting the same errors currently.
Maybe it would be best if I wait for the official migration.
Yeah looks like this is in the post_alerts table, we need to sweep through many tables
Curious where you are on this issue now? Did the errors stop?
Originally we were thinking of making some official migration here, but the risk far outweighs the benefit. We find it exceedingly rare to come across DBs with more than 2,147,483,647 posts. 2.1 billion is a real big number.
The downside of increasing the sized everywhere are that storage requirements go up.
Where we are now is that we are considering adding a rake task that “makes space” if you are in an outlier case where you have tables in Discourse that containe 2 billion rows (or had 2 billion rows of churn)
Thanks for the follow up @sam
I just upgraded to 2.8.0.beta6 and still getting the integer out of range errors.
I think that it’s just the notifications that has got to a massive number, which is a bit more realistic to reach the limit compared to number of posts. A lot of large topics with many replies, likes etc. from different users can result in quite a lot of notifications.
A rake task sounds fantastic
So che questo è un thread vecchio –
Abbiamo appena riscontrato questo problema anche nella nostra configurazione (devforum.roblox.com)! Stiamo eseguendo la v2.8.9, ma aggiorneremo presto alla 3.0.1.
Abbiamo notato che qualcosa non andava quando gli utenti hanno iniziato a vedere 403/500 mentre cercavano di mettere “mi piace” o togliere “mi piace” ai post.
Poi mi sono imbattuto in questo thread e ho controllato la nostra tabella delle notifiche:
=> SELECT id FROM notifications ORDER BY 1 DESC LIMIT 1;
id
------------
2147483647
(1 row)
@sam La soluzione alternativa sopra è ancora il miglior suggerimento, o è stata data maggiore considerazione a un rake task da settembre 2021?
Maggiori informazioni –
Dopo aver modificato la colonna notifications.id, sto riscontrando un problema separato dal job Jobs::PostAlert
Job exception: 2147498514 è fuori intervallo per ActiveModel::Type::Integer con limite di 4 byte
Forse c’è un’altra tabella/colonna che mi manca? O da qualche parte in ruby che si aspetta ancora il tipo di dati integer?
activemodel-6.1.6.1/lib/active_model/type/integer.rb:49:in `ensure_in_range'
activemodel-6.1.6.1/lib/active_model/type/integer.rb:28:in `serialize'
activemodel-6.1.6.1/lib/active_model/attribute.rb:56:in `value_for_database'
activemodel-6.1.6.1/lib/active_model/attribute.rb:68:in `forgetting_assignment'
activemodel-6.1.6.1/lib/active_model/attribute_set.rb:90:in `transform_values'
activemodel-6.1.6.1/lib/active_model/attribute_set.rb:90:in `map'
activemodel-6.1.6.1/lib/active_model/dirty.rb:262:in `forget_attribute_assignments'
activemodel-6.1.6.1/lib/active_model/dirty.rb:154:in `changes_applied'
activerecord-6.1.6.1/lib/active_record/attribute_methods/dirty.rb:202:in `_create_record'
activerecord-6.1.6.1/lib/active_record/callbacks.rb:461:in `block in _create_record'
activesupport-6.1.6.1/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:106:in `run_callbacks'
activesupport-6.1.6.1/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:824:in `_run_create_callbacks'
activerecord-6.1.6.1/lib/active_record/callbacks.rb:461:in `_create_record'
activerecord-6.1.6.1/lib/active_record/timestamp.rb:108:in `_create_record'
activerecord-6.1.6.1/lib/active_record/persistence.rb:900:in `create_or_update'
activerecord-6.1.6.1/lib/active_record/callbacks.rb:457:in `block in create_or_update'
activesupport-6.1.6.1/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:106:in `run_callbacks'
activesupport-6.1.6.1/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:824:in `_run_save_callbacks'
activerecord-6.1.6.1/lib/active_record/callbacks.rb:457:in `create_or_update'
activerecord-6.1.6.1/lib/active_record/timestamp.rb:126:in `create_or_update'
activerecord-6.1.6.1/lib/active_record/persistence.rb:507:in `save!'
activerecord-6.1.6.1/lib/active_record/validations.rb:53:in `save!'
activerecord-6.1.6.1/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:302:in `block in save!'
activerecord-6.1.6.1/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:354:in `block in with_transaction_returning_status'
activerecord-6.1.6.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/database_statements.rb:320:in `block in transaction'
activerecord-6.1.6.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/transaction.rb:319:in `block in within_new_transaction'
activesupport-6.1.6.1/lib/active_support/concurrency/load_interlock_aware_monitor.rb:26:in `block (2 levels) in synchronize'
activesupport-6.1.6.1/lib/active_support/concurrency/load_interlock_aware_monitor.rb:25:in `handle_interrupt'
activesupport-6.1.6.1/lib/active_support/concurrency/load_interlock_aware_monitor.rb:25:in `block in synchronize'
activesupport-6.1.6.1/lib/active_support/concurrency/load_interlock_aware_monitor.rb:21:in `handle_interrupt'
activesupport-6.1.6.1/lib/active_support/concurrency/load_interlock_aware_monitor.rb:21:in `synchronize'
activerecord-6.1.6.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/transaction.rb:317:in `within_new_transaction'
activerecord-6.1.6.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/database_statements.rb:320:in `transaction'
activerecord-6.1.6.1/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:350:in `with_transaction_returning_status'
activerecord-6.1.6.1/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:302:in `save!'
activerecord-6.1.6.1/lib/active_record/suppressor.rb:48:in `save!'
/app/app/models/notification.rb:40:in `tap'
/app/app/models/notification.rb:40:in `consolidate_or_create!'
activerecord-6.1.6.1/lib/active_record/relation/delegation.rb:67:in `block in consolidate_or_create!'
activerecord-6.1.6.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:406:in `block in scoping'
activerecord-6.1.6.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:804:in `_scoping'
activerecord-6.1.6.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:406:in `scoping'
activerecord-6.1.6.1/lib/active_record/associations/collection_proxy.rb:1109:in `scoping'
activerecord-6.1.6.1/lib/active_record/relation/delegation.rb:67:in `consolidate_or_create!'
/app/app/services/post_alerter.rb:496:in `create_notification'
/app/app/services/post_alerter.rb:825:in `block in notify_post_users'
/app/app/services/post_alerter.rb:838:in `block (2 levels) in each_user_in_batches'
activerecord-6.1.6.1/lib/active_record/relation/delegation.rb:88:in `each'
activerecord-6.1.6.1/lib/active_record/relation/delegation.rb:88:in `each'
/app/app/services/post_alerter.rb:838:in `block in each_user_in_batches'
/app/app/services/post_alerter.rb:837:in `each'
/app/app/services/post_alerter.rb:837:in `each_slice'
/app/app/services/post_alerter.rb:837:in `each_user_in_batches'
/app/app/services/post_alerter.rb:821:in `notify_post_users'
/app/app/services/post_alerter.rb:162:in `after_save_post'
/app/app/jobs/regular/post_alert.rb:11:in `execute'
/app/app/jobs/base.rb:232:in `block (2 levels) in perform'
/app/lib/rails_multisite/connection_management.rb:80:in `with_connection'
/app/app/jobs/base.rb:221:in `block in perform'
/app/app/jobs/base.rb:217:in `each'
/app/app/jobs/base.rb:217:in `perform'
sidekiq-6.3.1/lib/sidekiq/processor.rb:196:in `execute_job'
sidekiq-6.3.1/lib/sidekiq/processor.rb:164:in `block (2 levels) in process'
sidekiq-6.3.1/lib/sidekiq/middleware/chain.rb:138:in `block in invoke'
/app/lib/sidekiq/pausable.rb:138:in `call'
sidekiq-6.3.1/lib/sidekiq/middleware/chain.rb:140:in `block in invoke'
sidekiq-6.3.1/lib/sidekiq/middleware/chain.rb:143:in `invoke'
sidekiq-6.3.1/lib/sidekiq/processor.rb:163:in `block in process'
sidekiq-6.3.1/lib/sidekiq/processor.rb:136:in `block (6 levels) in dispatch'
sidekiq-6.3.1/lib/sidekiq/job_retry.rb:112:in `local'
sidekiq-6.3.1/lib/sidekiq/processor.rb:135:in `block (5 levels) in dispatch'
sidekiq-6.3.1/lib/sidekiq/rails.rb:14:in `block in call'
activesupport-6.1.6.1/lib/active_support/execution_wrapper.rb:91:in `wrap'
activesupport-6.1.6.1/lib/active_support/reloader.rb:72:in `block in wrap'
activesupport-6.1.6.1/lib/active_support/execution_wrapper.rb:91:in `wrap'
activesupport-6.1.6.1/lib/active_support/reloader.rb:71:in `wrap'
sidekiq-6.3.1/lib/sidekiq/rails.rb:13:in `call'
sidekiq-6.3.1/lib/sidekiq/processor.rb:131:in `block (4 levels) in dispatch'
sidekiq-6.3.1/lib/sidekiq/processor.rb:257:in `stats'
sidekiq-6.3.1/lib/sidekiq/processor.rb:126:in `block (3 levels) in dispatch'
sidekiq-6.3.1/lib/sidekiq/job_logger.rb:13:in `call'
sidekiq-6.3.1/lib/sidekiq/processor.rb:125:in `block (2 levels) in dispatch'
sidekiq-6.3.1/lib/sidekiq/job_retry.rb:79:in `global'
sidekiq-6.3.1/lib/sidekiq/processor.rb:124:in `block in dispatch'
sidekiq-6.3.1/lib/sidekiq/logger.rb:11:in `with'
sidekiq-6.3.1/lib/sidekiq/job_logger.rb:33:in `prepare'
sidekiq-6.3.1/lib/sidekiq/processor.rb:123:in `dispatch'
sidekiq-6.3.1/lib/sidekiq/processor.rb:162:in `process'
sidekiq-6.3.1/lib/sidekiq/processor.rb:78:in `process_one'
sidekiq-6.3.1/lib/sidekiq/processor.rb:68:in `run'
sidekiq-6.3.1/lib/sidekiq/util.rb:43:in `watchdog'
sidekiq-6.3.1/lib/sidekiq/util.rb:52:in `block in safe_thread'
Sì, questo rimane l’unico workaround qui. Sono preoccupato di cambiarlo nel core, ma immagino che questo continuerà a succedere su forum giganteschi se non lo risolveremo.
Lo svantaggio è l’aumento dello spazio di archiviazione.
Sai se ci sono utilizzi nel servizio post_actions (o da qualche parte nel processo di notifica) che potrebbero ancora aspettarsi interi dopo aver eseguito ALTER?
Stiamo riscontrando errori 5xx nelle chiamate like/unlike a /post_actions con la risposta
{"errors":["The requested URL or resource could not be found."],"error_type":"not_found"}
Inoltre, alcuni job falliscono intorno alle notifiche (Jobs::BookmarkReminderNotifications, Jobs::GrantAnniversaryBadges, Jobs::PostAlert).
Ho aggiunto il backtrace per PostAlert nel mio messaggio precedente; sembra che ci sia un problema lanciato per un limite intero da consolidate_or_create in notification.rb.
Per il nostro utilizzo, l’aumento dello spazio di archiviazione non è una grossa preoccupazione se possiamo ripristinare la funzionalità 
Prova a riavviare il tuo container, potrebbe esserci della cache in memoria.