Mediawiki syntax is incredibly easy to use and kind of genius. It would also work well with wiki posts. It also seems to be more familiar to non-developers than Markdown but I could be very wrong.
Examples:
==header==
===subheader===
====sub-subheader====
*bullet point without needing space
‘’‘bold’’’
‘‘italics’’
[[File:easyfilereferencing.png]]
[[File:easyfileformatting.png|300x300px|right|caption]]
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Formatting
Falco
(Falco)
November 12, 2019, 3:16pm
2
Discourse is heavily invested in Markdown, as @codinghorror even went to co-build https://commonmark.org/ to develop a markdown standard.
7 Likes
ah ok. np ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
I wonder if it would even be legal to sell something with mediawiki syntax, I assume so though
@orchardstreet , it would be. MediaWiki is FOSS, and no entity has patented any markup syntax.