Hey there Discourse team, I am totally new here and I love what you have done so far. I noticed that when someone replies to a thread created in Discourse forums that answer is marked as an Article with microdata. This comes up as invalid at Google’s Testing Tool since it is missing a few markups …

@tolkin reported to me that Google is still showing posts as invalid: [image] The image requirement is bizarre. It needs to be an image of the item (the post in this case), not an image contained in the post (which usually won’t exist) or from some metadata about the post. Google’s tool should be …

I cannot be sure, but it appears the only change that was made to the code was to change the schema type from Article to DiscussionForumPosting, which doesn’t solve the problem. The change did not include the Google required attributes: author: missing and required This could be the poster name …

My screenshot is from Google’s tool. I added the heading today, but the image attr doesn’t make sense.

For what it’s worth, there are SEO advantages to getting this feature in place, based on this article: https://blog.kissmetrics.com/get-started-using-schema/ Considering much of a forum’s success depends on organic traffic, this could be a real benefit to the software.

[image] neil: @tolkin reported to me that Google is still showing posts as invalid: [image] codinghorror: Seems like they are still required : For now I would just change the schema type as DiscussionForumPosting seems much more correct. Yes. I just changed the schema type for now.

Looks like the latest version recently fixed the errors. :grin: [47D9618A-9A93-4BC8-BD8B-3FA1DF4233E3]

Hi Discourse team, First of all, I am new here, so I hope I am doing well posting here for a bug. I tried to find an existing topic before to post a new one but I did not find anything, so I am sorry in advance if such topic already exists. Do not hesitate to link it or do whatever is necessary. T…

Hi Discourse team, I posted my question about two weeks ago. I assume fixing microdata will take a certain amount of time but since I got no answer yet I allow myself to ask you if the fix is on track and when it could be released ? Thank you in advance for your work and your reply.

Are all 61 errors saying the same thing? <div itemprop='itemListElement' itemscope itemtype='http://schema.org/ListItem'> needs to have a “position” attribute?

Google Structured Data -- Invalid Article Schema

Soutien

vinothkannans (Vinoth Kannan) Mars 3, 2017, 3:20 18

Yes. I just changed the schema type for now.

1 « J'aime »

Different schema type for Topics and Posts

Sujet		Réponses	Vues
Discussion Forum Schema improvements Support	34	3568	Janvier 23, 2025
Different schema type for Topics and Posts Feature	16	3839	Janvier 1, 2024
Google structured data for forums and profile pages Feature seo	14	1687	Janvier 1, 2024
Does Discourse support Google Structured Data (i.e. schema.org)? Feature	3	1859	Mars 3, 2017
🏆 Discourse Rich JSON-LD Microdata Plugin Plugin	14	495	Janvier 27, 2026

Google Structured Data -- Invalid Article Schema

Sujets connexes