멤버들에게 신뢰도를 더 눈에 띄게 보여주고 설명하는 방법은?

Well the answers which I got in this thread are good but I took a slightly different path. Instead of just copying all the content from the Disourse Trust Levels article, I collected some important parts and made an infographic with it. It worked like a charm and now even if someone asks us then we just share the image and everything is done.

4개의 좋아요

I was about to answer this but then saw

So the obvious question is, care to share the infographic?

4개의 좋아요

This blog post about trust levels is also linked from the trust level badges. I think that shows it’s considered good practice to explain trust levels. But with this setup users are send off the site and then presented a text thats actually written for admins. That’s double confusing..

I would find it helpful if there’s a faq page right on the site explaining trust level. This way user wont be send off-site and admins can easily adjust the information, similarly to the guidelines.

In general I would prefer to have faq separated from the guidelines and implemented as a section that can hold several pages.

2개의 좋아요

Sure, you are free to set up your site however you like! But remember…

3개의 좋아요

Is there a policy about using information from wiki posts on meta? I would like to put some topics explaining discourse functionality right on our site and wondered if i can use what’s on meta as building blocks?

1개의 좋아요

Sure that is fine, go for it.

6개의 좋아요