Hello,
It’s my first post and I am sorry that it’s not something that helps others rather asking for help.
We have been using our installation of Discourse on our local server for internal communications for two years. And we like it a lot.
I find Discourse’s topic link preview(Onebox?) one of the best features of Discourse and it has been working great until I change all the categories permission to the same private(closed) group only removing “everyone”.
I had to do it because we’d like to invite guests to a specific category and we did not want them to see all our internal channels.
I understand that I will not be able to see the topic preview if the security group is different.
But all our category has the same security group called “our company name”.
But still, any topic link except the ones that belong to the same category is not working.
Will that be any way that we can have the topic preview feature with the category not open to “everyone”?
I think I extensively searched the forum but I could not find the topic with the same issue.
I saw the post above but the problem is that my category A and category B has the same security group. but it’s not just public.
By the way, I think Discourse is the best solution available not only for the public forum but also for internal communication. In my opinion/use case, it’s better than Slack or Teams. We had used both solutions for years especially Slack since it was beta, We switched to Teams from Slack for a while and have been using Discourse for 2 years now.
Thank you for developing and open-sourcing this great solution.
I’m also having this same issue. I wanted to onebox something in the subcategory which has the same permissions as the category, but could not do this. The subcategory cannot be public, but it is visable to everyone in the category, so should be suitable for oneboxing
Eu cito a parte que quero usar, e isso funciona muito bem. Você pode até fazer um pequeno trecho e usar o expandir para mostrar a postagem completa.
(Adicionado depois: se o usuário tiver permissão para ver a categoria de onde a citação é)
Ele diz ‘Em outro tópico’ em vez do título do tópico, então não é super suave, mas tem sido uma boa solução alternativa para nós. A vantagem é que ele também mantém sua formatação.
Você pode ajustá-lo um pouco para que não expanda adicionando full:true à citação, ou simplesmente remover para o nome de usuário se você não quiser o link ‘Em outro tópico’:
E uma terceira opção bônus, cada vez mais low-tech, para simplesmente substituir o nome de usuário pelo título do tópico:
Embora o emoji de espanto esteja me fazendo pensar que julguei mal isso de alguma forma.
A vantagem é que ele também mantém sua formatação.
