Configuração `Log anonymizer details` não anonimiza completamente nomes de usuário

zogstrip · Janeiro 21, 2026, 4:21pm

@Moin percebi que estava sendo muito negligente ao fazer a atualização

github.com/discourse/discourse

FIX: Only anonymize staff log fields that contain the username

main ← fix/anonymizer-selective-field-replacement

opened 04:19PM - 21 Jan 26 UTC

ZogStriP

+19 -4

Follow-up to 1fd17242d1. The previous implementation replaced all four UserHi…story fields (context, details, previous_value, new_value) whenever any one of them contained the username. This caused confusing output in the staff action logs UI - for example, a "check email" action that only had the username in the context field would display: New: [removed due to user anonymization] Previous: [removed due to user anonymization] [removed due to user anonymization] ...even though those fields were originally empty. Now each field is updated independently using SQL CASE expressions, so only fields that actually contain the username get replaced. Fields with unrelated content or nil values are preserved. This keeps the anonymization effective while avoiding the cluttered display. Ref - https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/387500

Tópico		Respostas	Visualizações
User anonymization and staff_action_logs Support	7	707	8 de Setembro de 2021
User still able to log in after anonymization Bug anonymization	4	76	30 de Novembro de 2025
Username change logging even if it failed Bug	3	589	13 de Maio de 2019
Profile links not updated after anonymizing an user? Support anonymization	0	122	5 de Julho de 2021
Admins changing user's name (not username) should be logged Bug	5	746	22 de Novembro de 2018

Configuração `Log anonymizer details` não anonimiza completamente nomes de usuário

Tópicos relacionados