البحث عن بدائل ل vBulletin (مستضافة ذاتياً)

كنا ندير منتدى كبيرًا وأغلقناه قبل عدة سنوات. جربت للتو تثبيت vBulletin 5.x وكان كارثة تامة!

أبحث عن بدائل (مستضافة ذاتيًا فقط).

هناك بعض الأمور التي تهمني:

  • التوافق مع البنية التقنية الحالية: أريد التثبيت في domain.com/community/ دون الحاجة إلى تعديل إعدادات الخادم (نحن لسنا متجر Ruby بأي شكل، بل نعتمد بشكل أساسي على LAMP. لست خبيرًا تقنيًا، لكنني متأكد من أن فريقنا قادر على حل ذلك).
  • صداقة لمحركات البحث (بما في ذلك السرعة وتحسين أداء الويب)، وهي عامل بالغ الأهمية بالنسبة لي نظرًا لطبيعة المنتدى.
  • ربط النماذج بـ Salesforce: نستخدم Salesforce و Pardot، ونرغب في أن تُضاف الحسابات الجديدة المُسجَّلة والمُتحقَّق منها تلقائيًا إلى Salesforce/Pardot.
  • صلاحيات مخصصة: أريد أن أتمكن من جعل بعض المنتديات عامة، وبعضها مخصص للأعضاء فقط، وبعضها مقيد بصلاحيات مستخدمين محددين جدًا. ما مدى مرونة نظام الصلاحيات في Discourse؟
  • قابلية التخصيص (التصميم): لدينا فريق تصميم كبير ونرغب في تخصيص المظهر بطرق فريدة. أفضل ألا يضطر الفريق لتعلم Ruby أو JS للتعديل على المظهر.

بشكل عام، ما هي آراؤكم؟ أحب أن أسمع ملاحظاتكم.
شكرًا مقدّمًا.

4 إعجابات

Well this is tricky. Discourse is not a LAMP app, so that will be different. However, that is the reason of Docker, all the Discourse stack is confined to the container image so you don’t need to install anything else on the host. Changing the default install to listen to a unix socket (so you can use your reverse proxy at domain.com and proxy requests to /community to the socket) is just a couple of lines of configuration.

Not sure what is WPO but Discourse ranks great on search engines out of the box, as long as you have actual content on the forum.

As long as those tools can handle a webhook, or you can quickly write a translation layer in your LAMP app it’s an easy task.

Every category can have different permissions, this is a basic feature.

Discourse is a “Single Page Application” so if you want more deep customization you will need to write JS code. However, there is a lot you can do with just HTML+CSS, so you it depends more on what is your expectation.

6 إعجابات

Tried to reply via the reply via email feature (which seems like a cool feature!) got this (not off to a compelling start)

Is this feature enabled on this board?

Anyways, on the config, when you say it’s basic feature - does that mean that it’s common and everyone has it, or that it’s not very robust?

Is there a screengrab or anything somewhere that showcases the permissions system?

Discourse, in general, is extremely robust.

إعجاب واحد (1)

Got it. Is there a walkthrough somewhere on permissions?

Does this help?

Also see

6 إعجابات

That does help yes. Thanks.

We actually have a very unique use case, I’m wondering if it has been done or whether it is possible.

Imagine a customer posts a very specific post (which really only applies to them), we would like to flag it so only admins and the user who posted can read and reply, thus taking the discussion private if you will (The whole community does not always need to see your discussion around a support issue for instance)

Is this something you can do with default feature set or will we need to code it?

إعجاب واحد (1)

You can private message a group. You could configure that group how you want.

5 إعجابات

That is not what I was asking for, let me clarify. A customer starts a “thread” on the forums (not a DM or group etc) and we determine that thread is only relevant to that customer. Without deleting the thread or moving it, we’d like a toggle to have it so only that poster and the board admins can see it. Make sense?

إعجابَين (2)

You can convert a regular topic into a personal message. That’s the best and simplest way to make it private like that.

8 إعجابات

IC that might work, thanks for that

إعجابَين (2)

@rewebmaster Just for your context, Discourse is often used for handling support requests. See for instance

8 إعجابات