From reading a few topics, it seems that this is a possible feature? To combat spam, many people use wildcard domains, plus addressing or Gmail dots . Unfortunately Discourse doesn’t allow for this meaning any email replies to threads and PMs bounce instead of working correctly. Anyone using these m…

It’s possible in Discourse to have a secondary email from which users can reply. Have the receive-only email as the primary, and add the user’s regular email as the secondary. You would be shifting the burden of managing this onto the Discourse admin because currently it can only be done through the…

To be clear, I’m not asking about infinite addresses! Just a single approved outgoing address that works with reply-by-email. I’m not exactly sure what “internal and not exposed support” means as an end user.

Basically it is a complex change that is in progress over a series of many months or even years.

Ah I follow you. Planned feature?

I don’t really understand what you mean. But if you’re using Gmail then there’s a really easy work around which requires no changes to Discourse. Email aliases are probably supported by many other email systems too.

As I explained, most people do this to have a separate receive-only address for each service then use the same outgoing email address for all sending. The issue is not resolved by making an email alias as you’d have to take ages to manually add hundreds of email aliases and clog up your From: drop …

Thanks that’s exactly what I was querying. So as an end user on another Discourse product, I need to contact an admin to enable this at present?

Correct - only an admin with ssh access to the server would be able to do it.

Is there any future plan to allow this to be accessible through the Web interface?

[imagen] turkeyphant: To combat spam, many people use wildcard domains, plus addressing or Gmail dots . Unfortunately Discourse doesn’t allow for this meaning any email replies to threads and PMs bounce instead of working correctly. Anyone using these methods should be able to authorise additiona…

You’re right, it’s far from ideal. But the solution does make sense (bear with me). First of all, the outgoing email address can be outgoing-only, just as the receiving address is incoming-only. This allows you to reduce unwanted spam as well as identify the source. As explained, aliasing is not a…

Responder por correo electrónico: direcciones adicionales

Soporte

omarfilip 15 Agosto, 2019 17:35 10

Es posible en Discourse tener un correo electrónico secundario desde el cual los usuarios puedan responder. Establece el correo de solo recepción como principal y agrega el correo habitual del usuario como secundario. Esto trasladaría la carga de gestionar esto al administrador de Discourse, ya que actualmente solo se puede realizar a través de la consola de Rails.

Tema		Respuestas	Vistas
Confused by Error Message From Reply-by-Email Support	26	3179	4 Junio 2020
Two emails for one user Feature	48	15454	20 Junio 2017
Allow reply-to individual instead of topic/forum (mailing list feature) Support	55	12964	27 Agosto 2022
Allow user to reply-via-email using a different email address than their account email address Support email	2	688	4 Octubre 2023
Confusion between Reply To and Reply List in email responses UX	45	6489	13 Octubre 2021

Responder por correo electrónico: direcciones adicionales

Temas relacionados