Gerenciamos um site comunitário para professores que utilizam o currículo Bootstrap para ensinar ciência da computação dentro de aulas convencionais de matemática, ciências e estudos sociais. Nossa IDE é baseada na nuvem, o que nos permite incorporar uma instância dela dentro de uma postagem no Discourse — isso é simplesmente incrível, e já estamos entusiasmados por termos migrado para a plataforma só por causa desse recurso.
No entanto, há bastante conteúdo que gostaríamos de incorporar dessa forma, e parte dele é mais largo do que a largura da postagem permite. Personalizar o CSS para permitir postagens mais largas não tem dado certo, e, no final, o que eu adoraria é que os IFRAMEs fossem tratados da mesma forma que as imagens: uma miniatura é exibida, mas ao clicar nela, abre-se um lightbox tão largo quanto a janela do navegador.
Nunca mexi com desenvolvimento de plugins do Discourse antes, mas também consigo imaginar alguma extensão do Onebox que pegue URLs correspondentes a um padrão específico e gere a marcação apropriada. Talvez haja uma maneira mais fácil? Curioso se alguém mais já se deparou com esse caso de uso.
Maybe @Johani would have some ideas. In general heavy embedding of live content is a bad idea, whereas “click-to-load” like codepen does is more ideal:
@craigomez, I might be misreading your post, but it sounds like you’re suggesting I modify the source of the page I’m embedding, in order to have links in that page open in a shadowbox. Is that right? If so, let me clarify that I don’t want that – rather, I want the enclosing IFRAME (a node in the rendered topic, which just happens to contain another page) to be in a shadowbox. And if that’s not right, and I misunderstood, my apologies.
@codinghorror, click-to-load is a mighty fine solution. Happy to pursue that option, if there’s a resource somewhere to follow?
It would be super cool if you could maximize without needing to visit the site, I wonder if this is a feature @chriscoyier would be interested in adding, not sure how it would be wrangled, but it makes sense for this example you made, for sure.
I’d love to make our editor click-to-load. Is there an example somewhere for how this was done with CodePen? I’m assuming whitelisting WeScheme.org in our installation is the least of the steps needed.
check out this previous post/topic for additional context:
Seems like that is done on the codepen side?
Make the preview “Click-to-Load” : Check the checkbox next to “use click-to-load” to enable the preview version for your embedded Pen. Preview embeds show a static image preview of your Pen with a “Run Pen” button. When your visitors click the button, the Pen will load.
Very interesting! I was able to install the theme using the linked directions (thanks!), but I don’t see a UI for editing the theme settings in order to whitelist my site. Any suggestions for where I should be looking? Thanks in advance!
If you’ve installed the theme and cannot see the settings area, then that probably means you’re on a version of Discourse that does not support theme settings.
Even if you’re on the stable branch, the latest release, 2.0, supports theme settings so I would suggest you update Discourse and try again.
