Split user preferences menu into sections

Adding tabs will also make it easier for plugins to add settings to the user preferences page. Right now, we only have a few outlets which is mixed together with the existing settings.

4 Likes

How many settings would need to be added before it should be modeled like the admin preferences? Not saying we have nearly enough atm, but: I do like the section idea (also present in admin), and if there are a ton of settings, they can do a search for something.

Not too many more :slight_smile: now that I added user api keys it is really really wanting.

7 Likes

is it at least possible to put the “forum behavior” out of other preferences part?

while it’s so easy to follow/mute categories and tags in the preference tab, most of our users do not even notice it.

2 Likes

It’s just one fellow’s comment but here’s what one of my mods remarked to me just now:

the preferences page in discourse is pretty challenging to figure out. notification settings seem scattered and it looks a bit like a jet control panel … too many things for non-pilots to be able to land safely.


Edit: at the risk of belaboring the point, these are the instructions that trigger my mod’s comment:


It would be useful if I could link near where the user will find the aforementioned setting, instead of asking them to search for it up and down the preferences page.

4 Likes

Yeah, we should probably split it into sections. Not sure when we’ll have time to do that, though.

3 Likes

I was pointed to this thread from one I started on a different ux issue. As a fairly new Discourse user (not programmer or administer) I thought y’all might appreciate my POV.

As @sam says, it’s a rare page to visit - at least I’m guessing it is. As such, going to great effort to improve it near perfectly isn’t likely the best use of the programmers’ time. Don’t let the perfect get in the way of the good.

From what I’ve seen, there’s a split in my mind in the options presented. ~40% profile information, ~30% how the forum works for the user, and ~30% essentially managing lists (of tags, categories and users).

Given the low priority of any change here (see above), I’d suggest splitting into only two parts for now: “My Profile” and “Preferences”. There’s plenty of room:


Disclaimer: I only use Discourse on a non-mobile screen, so I leave it to others to worry about the mobile presentation!

I think @Pad_Pors brings up a good point:

whatever i change in the profile page, i need to scroll down a lot in order to save the change. while for example in the admin panel, i can save any change in the setting right in front of the setting. and it helps me not to get tired.

It’d be really nice if the “Save Changes” button floated so as to remain on screen at all times!

4 Likes

What build/version were they added in? Is there a list of them somewhere?

How do people feel about the idea of hiding “advanced” options in each category from new users?

I sat next to a non-techie user as she worked her way through the preferences and she was so confused, it was quite uncomfortable to observe.

Could be an “show advanced options” to unlock the more esoteric preferences (and this would allow more UI space to explain the options in plain English)

Either that, or “unlock” more advanced preferences (e.g. User card background) using trust levels - that way, new users won’t be intimidated, and it also gives a touch of gamification?

Looking at the 1.8 #releases topic, it would appear the split is still on the table:

7 Likes

I just sent a pull request that should implement the feature requested here. Feedback is much appreciated.

2 Likes

It is dangerous to work on features that are on our active roadmap for a release, and I don’t recommend it unless you have specifically discussed it with us beforehand.

I am sorry for that.

How should I proceed about this? Is there any member of the team that was assigned to this issue? I implemented the behavior described above (if I understood correctly), but I am ready to make any change necessary.

2 Likes

No worries @nbianca this is pretty much our fault, we had a #pr-welcome tag on this topic, we should have been more careful.

I think perhaps in future leave a comment on topics you are taking prior to starting work, just in case the #pr-welcome tag is stale.

Can you include some screenshots of the changes you made?

5 Likes

Sure. Left-side links are actually anchors.

3 Likes

@nbianca The code looks fine but the behavior is confusing for me. I feel like the anchors have to be visible other wise it feels like I’m jumping to a random spot on the page. Perhaps it’ll be good to add some line breaks and a header for each section?

Another feedback that I have is that the left navigation bar needs to be sticky. Otherwise, if I click on a link that brings me to the bottom of the page I have to scroll back up in order to click on other links.

2 Likes

I think it is best to leave this alone until we get to the item that is already on our roadmap for this release… pr-welcome tag was never really correct for this I am afraid. We need to be more careful where we put that tag considering our roadmap @erlend_sh

2 Likes

To make an explicit criticism, the change as submitted is definitely not ambitious enough. What I’m pretty sure the team had in mind, and what is needed, is really an overhaul of the preferences page. Rethink every setting, what settings are related, where it belongs, and put them into pages that need navigation through each other.

Therefore, it was a mistake to leave pr-welcome on this, as that implied a simple fix would work.

8 Likes

Done per this:

4 Likes