When an unlisted topic refers to a listed topic, the former is backlinked in the latter, thus becoming “listed”.
Ideally topics would lose old and not gain any new back references when becoming unlisted. It seems okay to have the unlisted topics referencing the listed ones, though, if they happens to be explicitly linked there.
I’m a bit confused by the use of “invisible” and “unlisted”
If what is meant is that linking to an unlisted topic in a listed topic:
> changes the unlisted topic to listed, AFAIK that should not be happening.
> makes the unlisted topic more easily found, then yes, that is true.
Perhaps there is a misunderstanding about what “unlisted” means?
It does not mean the topic is “invisible”, it means the topic can only be accessed from a direct link to it.
Well, you’re not supposed to post links to unlisted topics unless you want the link out there. So from my perspective, this is a feature.
Unlisted means that: not listed in the Discourse UI proper. But if you explicitly link to it in a post you yourself typed on the computer using your keyboard? all bets are off…