I found a similar topic, but the answer wasn’t given there and the topic was closed.
Hello!
Yes there is go to the review queue. Select rejected and type will be queued post then you can select other options such as specific user.
[sketch-1587659663967]
In addition, you can always send the user a PM about their post.
This setting can be changed. Posts that have not been reviewed will be rejected.
auto handle queued age
If a post is not approved, do the users have a copy of it some where so they can revise and repost it?
If the moderator rejects it, the post disappears for the user. Why can’t the user find rejected posts in “My posts” section?
3 个赞
Hello there @Ed_Bobkov !
Thanks for asking this. Unfortunately the user cannot see the post that was rejected by the moderator. The user should ask @ moderators as to why they rejected the post.
Hope this answers your question.
2 个赞
riking
(Kane York)
2020 年10 月 7 日 21:51
4
Change to add this to the user archive export:
https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/10859
I don’t think we’re going to be showing rejected queued posts in the UI, but including it in the data export is not too hard.
2 个赞
But that’s not a solution.
A better way would be to let the user to change smth in the post. In this case we simply should keep the post inactive but dismiss it from the moderation tab.
A moderator can send the user a message what to fix in the post. This way the idea of the moderation process is fully realized.
But when we simply delete the post we damage the reputation of the site. Please, think of it from this point.
2 个赞
riking
(Kane York)
2020 年10 月 8 日 18:42
6
Hmm, if the post is “okay but needs edits”, I typically approve and then edit or ask the person to edit. Only rejecting spam.
What kind of expectations are you looking for in the post approval queue?
1 个赞
Nothing unusual. Approve or decline. But if declined, they should be kept in “My posts” in a draft or smth like that mode.
1 个赞
riking
(Kane York)
2020 年10 月 8 日 19:35
8
I meant, what kind of approval criteria do you have that returning the post to the user actually makes sense? When do you press Decline?
1 个赞
It’s our internal guidelines. Each forum has there own rules.
1 个赞
我们也需要在我们的网站上实现这一点。有时作者在提交审批后发现他们想编辑某些内容。或者版主发现有一些错误需要修改。我认为,在版主拒绝主题后,作者可以编辑并重新提交,这样会更好。
2 个赞
对于任何被审核并失去可修改主题的主题创建者来说,这个问题都非常重要。我想知道为什么它没有得到解决,因为解决方案可能非常简单——更改顺序——而不是删除帖子,而是将其保留为草稿,并附有版主给主题所有者的消息。
@codinghorror ,@sam ,您能否分享一下您对此问题的看法?
被拒绝的帖子是否包含在用户的“下载全部”数据导出中,这是否有用?
我不认为这会对想要编辑被拒绝的主题并重新提交给审核的普通用户有任何帮助。
1 个赞
这个问题没有答案,这很奇怪。对其他人来说真的不重要吗?
loic
(Loïc Guitaut)
2022 年1 月 13 日 09:37
17
据我所知,这方面没有任何变化。有了新版本,用户可以看到他们待处理的帖子,但如果帖子被拒绝,我们目前拥有的行为仍然相同。
4 个赞
@Ed_Bobkov ,这对我来说非常重要。我刚刚在一个 Discourse 实例中丢失了一篇相当长的帖子,原因是存在一个重大但未被注意到的遗漏,导致它必然被拒绝。如果我没有找到这个,一旦被拒绝,我就会认为它被完全删除了。
我们现在为版主提供了“修改帖子”选项,以便在处理审批时选择,这在某些情况下可能更合适:
This has now been implemented.
You now have the extra option to 'Revise Post` alongside the existing ‘Approve’ and ‘Reject’ options:
[revise post]
This will open up a modal where you can provide feedback:
[feedback]
And this will send a PM to the user:
[revise post PM]
2 个赞