nathank
Novembro 17, 2023, 9:04pm
1
Por que este plugin tem a licença MIT em vez da GPLv2 usual?
The MIT License (MIT)
Copyright (c) 2015 TAN GUO XIANG
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
show original
Gostaria de saber se isso deveria ser realinhado com o restante do código do Discourse.
1 curtida
Eles atualizaram recentemente a licença de todos os plugins e componentes de temas em favor da MIT, adicionando quaisquer que estivessem faltando.
Não sei o motivo específico, mas acho que essa mudança faz sentido. A licença MIT é simples, direta e permissiva. Menos atrito e ambiguidade. Ela combina bem com a filosofia de código aberto do Discourse.
3 curtidas
