I’ve heard this idea come up a handful of times over the years. Providing the right level of affordance here is probably the trickiest part.
Happy to explore it more in a Feature topic as Tobias suggested though.
I’ve heard this idea come up a handful of times over the years. Providing the right level of affordance here is probably the trickiest part.
Happy to explore it more in a Feature topic as Tobias suggested though.
I came across an internal conversation, where James suggested the below. I will also do this going forward when editing a reply to remove an at mention. It’s gentler than adding a reply or sending a PM to inform a new member about etiquette.
Indeed and of course this can often create parity confusion conflicts with new members. Who have already been indoctrines in other forums/platforms in this fairly common practice outside of Meta. But I do appreciate the reasoning as why they prefer it not to be used.
However @RGJ Dynamic groups idea might be an interesting path. What if a group could be used or maybe an extension to groups that has a setting to similar to @groupmentions that restricts who can @mentuon individuals within the group? Those who are not permitted ut becomes as @Moin suggested a silent mention.