Richie
10월 29, 2021, 8:40오후
1
배지는 우리 커뮤니티의 매우 중요한 부분입니다.
회원님들께서는 배지를 좋아하시고, 우리는 수많은 맞춤형 배지를 추가했으며, 배지들은 매우 소중히 여겨지고 많은 분들이 얻고 싶어 합니다.
하지만 배지에 대해 논의하거나 언급할 때, 배지를 아름답게 보여줄 좋은 방법이 없습니다.
여기 메타 사이트에서 좋은 예시로, 새로 추가된 “Support Enthusiast” 배지가 있습니다. 정말 멋져 보이죠:
하지만 배지에 링크를 걸면 어떨까요?
아, 정말 끔찍합니다:
https://meta.discourse.org/badges/140/support-advocate
https://meta.discourse.org/badges/139/support-enthusiast
카테고리 링크는 아름답게 표시됩니다. 예를 들어 https://meta.discourse.org/c/feature/2 링크를 사용할 때 Contribute > Feature
Share your ideas and suggestions about how to improve Discourse with new features or improvements to existing ones. Upvote ideas others have shared previously and share more context about your use cases and why they’d be valuable to you → Requesting new features for Discourse
정말 멋집니다!
우리에게 소중한 배지에 대해 뭔가 조치를 취해 주실 수 있을까요?
10개의 좋아요
Richie
9월 3, 2022, 12:49오후
2
I’ve come up with a work around for the poor displaying of a badge link, I now insert a space at the start of the new link so at least now people see a nicer badge description instead of just a URL.
For example, no leading space:
https://meta.discourse.org/badges/140/support-advocate
One leading space:
Discourse Meta
Better
I’m guessing when linking to a badge it’s just following the same principle as if linking to a regular topic or a post
3개의 좋아요
I do like the idea of a swish onebox that includes the Badge image and the description. I’ll put my vote in for it.
3개의 좋아요
Richie
3월 10, 2023, 8:20오후
4
Me too, I mean, who wouldn’t
Is there a formal method for getting features on to the roadmap?
Could I throw this out in the wild as a paid-for gig? Then try to get a PR approved for core eventually? I’m unsure of the process or what qualifies something for core
Richie
1월 12, 2025, 6:54오후
5
Don’t forget to hit the Vote button at the top of this page
1개의 좋아요
Definitely a cool feature which could encourage activity! Gets my vote!
1개의 좋아요
