I would be inclined not to rename the trust levels and instead use Automation to add users to some other group when they moved to each trust level. At some point someone will be confused about what is happening and not know that Geek Apprentice is TL1 and not understand any of the settings having to do with TL1.
Oh, so your community was small enough that you ended up being able to edit the titles of each member individually? That sounds fine.
A search turned up another, automatic solution, which is to use the badge system to automatically set the memberâs title based on their trust level.
Jay is right that you donât want to tinker with the naming of trust level groups themselves because they have a particular purpose in Discourse. You donât need to worry about that too much as you start your community, but if you are interested you can read up on it at Understanding Discourse Trust Levels .
I think itâs fine to rename the Trust Levels to something more fitting for your site ethos. I can think of a few people who have done it and theyâve had no particular issues with it.
Thatâs what I did too. I didnât edit every member manually, but simply renamed the existing trust levels according to our style. It worked just flawless.
Itâs a bummer that EDIT: tag badge sql isnât allowed on your hosting. I think itâd be cool if it could be enabled with a set of safe swl tags, perhaps with some parameters. Badges with group triggers is a really powerful tool. (maybe one day Iâll think hard enough to make a topic about it)
The main problem that can arise when you change the names of trust level groups is that members will get confused who try to understand what the trust levels mean and where they stand. It can also cause you to get confused yourself as site owner, if you change the name and then donât remember how the new name corresponds with trust level settings. This is why I tend to recommend not tinkering with the trust level names.
Changing the badge names associated with trust levels is fine. I did this on my personal site too.. I changed âLeaderâ to âInner Circleâ.
But of course every community has its own personality and needs, and Discourse is flexible and can be customized accordingly. Looks like Dan has figured it all out and has come up with some great trust level names!
Are you referring to badge sql? We do turn it on for our enterprise customers. I agree itâs a shame we canât offer it on our self-serve hosting because of security concerns. Would be great to revisit this and explore ways to make it safer - do start a new topic when you find the time.
Generally when people adapt their Trust Level names into something friendlier and more site appropriate they still stick with an escalating hierarchy of terms (like Danâs in the OP). Figuring out what TL one is isnât that tricky [1]
Ultimately theyâre still the same trust levels underneath, just with different titles.
The automatic groups do have some extra limitations to them compared to custom groups (as @satonotdead knows too well ), so you would still have those limitations even if you renamed them. But if all you want is nicer names for them then I think it works out quite nicely.
though if someone does decide to throw that convention out of the window and name them âflumpdonkerâ, âblottytopsâ, and âdrungeâ then all bets are off âŠď¸
But since the names have changed and a whole bunch of other settings and documentation refer to trust levels and then you donât have any, itâs confusing. And then if someone else comes along and tries to help and canât find trust levels then they donât have much chance,especially if they arenât an expert.
And probably they were changed before the admin knew much about discourse and two weeks later wonât remember that they changed the names, much less how.