I’m not sure whether this should be considered a bug but it’s inconsistent so.. At the moment, users can add [spoiler][/spoiler] (with no hidden text) to their posts in order to bypass the min post length that’s been set for a site - & our users are doing this. Characters from quotes of other post…

There are lots of creative ways to exploit the min post length setting, I believe @sam has said we’re not going to be able to stop them all.

There are & I can see his point :slight_smile: it would be helpful to get rid of this one but I guess what you’re saying is that it’s down to the site’s moderators to intervene if it’s being abused, which is fair enough.

[imagen] alexs: I guess what you’re saying is that it’s down to the site’s moderators to intervene if it’s being abused You’ll need to wait for Sam or another engineer to confirm, but yes, I believe that’s what our current position is on this.

No cuentes el contenedor de spoiler hacia el requisito de longitud mínima del post

Soporte

vinothkannans (Vinoth Kannan) 26 Enero, 2018 19:48 6

Here is the Sam’s post

https://meta.discourse.org/t/users-bypassing-the-10-character-rule/35257/2?u=vinothkannans

Tema		Respuestas	Vistas
Small Bug with Min Characters Support	1	888	6 Enero 2018
Soft hyphen counted in min post length Bug	1	1019	26 Abril 2015
Allow bypassing min post length for certain groups or trust levels Feature	4	851	27 Junio 2024
Min post length includes images and links Feature	2	526	1 Mayo 2019
[quote=reply issues] without adding additional text Support	10	920	19 Enero 2022

No cuentes el contenedor de spoiler hacia el requisito de longitud mínima del post

Temas relacionados