Federated users are considered "inactive"

Feature
1

  1. Visit t/356997/4.

  2. Invoke the avatar.

  3. image
    image507×123 19.7 KB

    1. Note that the username is incorrect, too. The original account is merely socialhub.activitypub.rocks/u/rokejulianlockhart.

    2. Because it’s not linked. [1] Should have been a separate thread, anyway.

  1. chat/c/icaria36/2985 ↩︎

2

That is discussed quite often, but it is by design.

3

@Jagster, the user isn’t inactive, though. Why not merely state that they’re federated?

4

Because Discourse users aren’t active users in the meaning they would be actual actors. Categories and tags are. And yes, that is a huge issue, and no, AFAIK, this is not a bug, but a Feature request, because it would change how Discourse works with AP.

Pure guess, but nowadays system makes possible how Discourse/Discourse works and it has been more important than how Discourse is federating to Mastodon direction. Discourse doesn’t understand Friendica either, or Pixelfed (well that one would be difficult, because content is so different and Discourse can’t federate images).

5

@Jagster, I don’t understand, but you’ve evidently a better comprehension of Discourse’s internals than I, so I’ll switch it to Feature. Thanks.