论坛所有者,你们是如何“战斗”Facebook群组的?

I really liked your list of actions btw. Creating superior structured content locally is the best way to go.

My concern is strategically we are feeding the lion and without coordinated mass abstention we sustain the original status quo. But ultimately I reluctantly accept reality!

Yes I’m aware I’m giving Google a pass and that’s a little biased perhaps but at least they support ‘the open web’ … at least for now.

6 个赞

I have tried with the title + Link + Short description. But the reach of the posts is not much.

2 个赞

Hello,

I think it’s more person-dependent. Members trust and follow the leaders. So I targeted the fb group admins to cooperate and one of the biggest former fb group admin joined us. He started advertising our forum in his group. People started coming more than before just because he suggested us…

I’m trying to turn the forum more like a social site in every way. The “forum” word: People think this is just another old school forum from 2000s. So I just called the forum: on our brand or Community. I completely remove the forum word. (It is much easier to change a word than their way of thinking.) That needed because people judge before they open the website. So there was a lots of time they just commented on fb —just another forum… etc. they actually didn’t click the link.

Interface and features

It also looks more like Facebook, unfortunately people more familiar this. First time I used category for homepage but now I just figured out the latest page is much better for communities it generate more activities from users.

I added a lot of features which makes it much better than Facebook.

Trading, auction, user ratings, trusted sellers, etc.
People like badges and avatar flairs, each group has an avatar flair which is appears next to users avatar.

Compare

I compare the forum with Facebook. People only knows Facebook so I have to highlight those things which is bad at there. What people don’t like on Facebook.

Facebook is full of bullying what we not tolerate and don’t accept on the forum this is a much more controllable place than fb. The trust level system add us the biggest ability to control these people… So people are much friendlier than on fb…

I never want to see a Facebook content on our forum! Forum is the quality contents place not the instant posts from Facebook. So I do the opposite I share quality content from the Forum to Facebook BUT I disable the comment section! That is important…. If they want to reply to the topic they have to register and reply on the Forum.

Cooperation with Members

I initiate the community into everything and I ask them before do anything. I created a category where they can send their ideas about the forum, Community and everything…

I always notify members when made any changes. Every Sunday I share them an update topic and summarize the weekly changes, development and everything. If something not clear they can ask and we can talk about it like a great big family. :slightly_smiling_face:

One other point is we can customize the Forum what Members needs! You cannot do that on Facebook.

And last but not least we are all the same in our Community!

These things makes the forum much better for quality members. I think this community is more cohesive and healthy. You have to show the way them. This is a very slow process but if one time they find your forum they never want to go back to Facebook.

22 个赞

I didn’t realize Zapier had a “short description” of the post. I’m going to switch mine to this. I’m currently using the full post, this is way too much for Facebook. Have you tried Twitter? I focus more of my social media marketing on Twitter than Facebook. I’ve organically grown my follower count to over 300. I know of some Twitter bots that could help with faster follower growth, but I’m worried about risking a suspension/ban on my account.

2 个赞

You may not know, but a post with no title or it is below will have higher engagement.

  • Description
  • Title

About Zapier I have up a number of scripts to try the integrated version, but it only includes articles and raw htm (When posting, FB does not recognize the format as handwriting).

So I am building via Rss here which will describe the short customization.

I will try it! sure.

Twitter tried it out from a programmer’s perspective, I just cross-post auto + summary content.

But since the account is less tracked, it doesn’t work well. Instead of buying, I think running targeted ads will generate better tracking.

6 个赞

I agree that ease of access is probably a significant aspect. But…

Have you considered that design, “friendliness” (of aesthetic), and ease of use or familiarity may also be major factors? I love Discourse, I participate in at least 5 Discourse forums regularly. But I recently started testing out Circle.so and while it is definitely inferior in many respects, even I actually liked some of its aesthetic and UX choices. More here:

5 个赞

How did you setup the auction and trade sites? Did you use a plugin?

2 个赞
3 个赞

anything is possible is you put your mind to it :slight_smile:

3 个赞

this is the ticket. niche niche niche.

2 个赞

How are webstore in Discourse helping fight against Facebook groups? E-commerce is totally different thing than groups or forums.

I have very profitable webshop and really active Facebook group connected to it, and Discourse forum that is practically dead, No one will change from group to forum.

Main reasons are

  • everybody are in Facebook
  • Discourse is way too difficult and editor is strange (I agree, coding scene loves markdown, rest of world not so much)

For me it took about one year to build up active group with 25 000 members. Forum has been up now a year and there is 300 registrations and three active members :upside_down_face:

Yes, 99-1 rule rules :slight_smile:

My target group are mostly women without any bigger intrest to tech — they are the most challenging group to get out from Facebook, I reckon.

10 个赞

In addition to these two I would add the Notification System is way too difficult and strange. When people see “Dismiss” they expect to clear the list, and when nothing seems to happen when they hit dismiss that is extremely disconcerting and introduces doubt into the way everything else works too. I am finding that my users are not able to trace simple things like seeing who has posted what recent updates, and that they way people generally use my other forums (look for the red dot to see “new” events, and navigate to them from the notifications screen) is almost unusable in Discourse.

Would be interested if anyone has suggestions or plugins on how to improve notifications.

6 个赞

Facebook’s app is the killer feature here. Dead easy to set up, push notifications. Easy and snappy to use.

When trying to cure my internet addiction, one of the first things I did was remove the FB and Twitter apps. Worked well to reduce my casual use of those sites.

The Discourse Hub iOS app is a good alternative but not as easy for the user to set up, and lacks push notifications. Notifications really make a difference.

I recently migrated a Vanilla forum to Discourse. It acts as the “discussion section” of a website I run. When I created a live notification badge (just a simple update count) on the main website, showing a count of new posts in the forum, it massively drew people from my website into the forum.

Update badges, push notifications etc, these are things that stimulate interest. At present Facebook does a better job than Discourse Hub. If we could easily “white label” Discourse Hub for our own forums, and get push notifications working, it’d help a lot in the fight against Zuck’s oligopoly.

Note - I think Discourse’s commercial offering does indeed feature push notifications.

13 个赞

无法对抗Facebook群组的,现在是移动互联网的时代。想要网民多使用你 的论坛就必须有在Facebook等平台上无法实现的功能,或者独一无二的让用户喜欢的功能。论坛没落了,全球都一样。即便是在中国,论坛也在消亡。

5 个赞

Translation:

Unable to fight Facebook groups, this is the age of the mobile Internet. If you want internet users to use your forums more, you must have features that are not available on platforms such as Facebook, or unique features that users like. The forum is gone, the world is the same. Even in China, forums are dying out.

19 个赞

我的主论坛依然活跃,因为人们仍然会通过谷歌(或 DuckDuckGo)搜索某个话题,并在搜索结果中看到我的小众社区排在前面。

Facebook 做不到这一点,也无法阻止我的网站出现。

Facebook 试图取代开放互联网,但失败了,苹果及其对原生“应用”的痴迷也是如此(原生应用也在走向消亡,付费应用几乎完全消失)。

这不是未来。Facebook 是一种短暂的时尚。Facebook 是一个极其昂贵的门面。如果它们被迫更严格地审查内容并承担全部责任,其成本只会不断上升。这样做它们还会疏远用户(而且已经做得够多了!)。

云计算革命意味着我的成本微乎其微!

开放互联网将占上风,因为大多数技术人员并不为 Facebook 工作,他们希望自己的产品能在搜索引擎上被看到。

Reddit 可能是更大的竞争对手,但这场竞争更加势均力敌。

我意识到在一些国家,“开放互联网”只是一个梦想,但许多国家将寻求捍卫它,而另一些国家则不幸地试图控制它。:grimacing:

我们必须尽一切努力抵制这些垄断!

10 个赞

嗯,有“web3”去中心化推动的努力,其中包含这方面的一些内容。

这个想法是创建一个去中心化的网络,用户可以在其中将他们的数据从一个服务传输到另一个服务,而不会受到公司围墙花园的阻碍。

欢迎来到我们自2013年以来的世界,web3粉丝们……我们一直在等你。 :wink:

11 个赞

我刚刚读完了 社区没有边界:Discourse 作为一种结构 - 构思与头脑风暴 这个主题,并结合该讨论,我非常想了解您认为 Discourse 如何允许用户“将数据从一个服务传输到另一个服务”。难道这不正是那个帖子所讨论的 Discourse 功能集中的缺失的部分吗?

2 个赞

我有点困惑。应该在不同的 Discourse 之间或与 Discourse 之间/从 Discourse 传输哪些数据?

1 个赞

你是否阅读了我链接的“社区没有边界”主题,或者任何关于 ActivityPub、联合等内容?有很多关于这种“可移植性”、“互操作性”、“联合”等可能性的讨论。任你选择。:grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:

1 个赞