I’ve got 4 people invited here on meta
and 8 people on my hosted discourse (/users/allen/invited)
and so I would think I’d have this badge (as would more than just @sam
https://meta.discourse.org/badges/26/campaigner
Would someone check it out?
The definition is 3 members, not 3 users
They got to be tl1
On my hosted site, I have invited 11 members and they are all TL1
What’s the difference between members & users?
Sorry I meant TL2
SELECT u.id user_id, current_timestamp granted_at
FROM users u
WHERE u.id IN (
SELECT invited_by_id
FROM invites i
JOIN users u2 ON u2.id = i.user_id
WHERE i.deleted_at IS NULL AND u2.active AND u2.trust_level >= 2 AND not u2.blocked
GROUP BY invited_by_id
HAVING COUNT(*) > 3
) AND u.active AND NOT u.blocked AND u.id > 0 AND
(:backfill OR u.id IN (:user_ids) )
Its meant to be a reasonably hard to get badge
https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-do-user-trust-levels-do/4924/5?u=sam
Member is defined as TL2 throughout Discourse.
I guess that’s fine for meta, but it means that badge won’t work for my forums, where we don’t let members invite members.
In that case, you should disable the badge.
1 Like
I think this is far too hard to get. This reads more like the gold level criteria.
I can bump it down to tl1 if you wish
Yeah that would be better, we want to encourage invites. Gold level of this can use TL2.
1 Like
Change the text for “Champion” to be “Invited {n} active members” to indicate it’s stricter than the previous level. (It still means TL2, and it’s kinda weird terminology-wise, but whatever. Anyone have a better idea?)
3 Likes