Aggiornamento di Discourse a Zeitwerk

Sviluppatore
1

Rails 6 include due modalità di autoloading: zeitwerk e classic. In quella pull request DEV: Upgrading Discourse to Rails 6 by KrisKotlarek · Pull Request #8083 · discourse/discourse · GitHub ho aggiornato Rails alla versione 6.0.0 con l’autoloader classic come fase transitoria. Sarebbe interessante provare a passare a Zeitwerk.

Zeitwerk è un caricatore di codice efficiente e thread-safe per Ruby. Finché il progetto segue le convenzioni di denominazione, Zeitwerk può individuare i file corretti e caricarli su richiesta o in anticipo, senza la necessità di alcun require o require_dependency. Inoltre, secondo quell’articolo https://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2019/2/22/zeitwerk-integration-in-rails-6-beta-2/, potrebbe offrire un piccolo incremento delle prestazioni all’applicazione.

Ci sono alcune operazioni che devo eseguire per farlo funzionare:

  1. Cambiare il nome di alcune classi per seguire la convenzione di denominazione di Rails. Ad esempio, il file canonical_url.rb dovrebbe definire la classe CanonicalUrl invece di CanonicalURL. Allo stesso modo, il file ondiff.rb dovrebbe definire la classe Onpdiff invece di ONPDiff. Un approccio alternativo sarebbe collegare un inflector personalizzato al progetto; tuttavia, penso che seguire la convenzione possa essere una scelta migliore - GitHub - fxn/zeitwerk: Efficient and thread-safe code loader for Ruby · GitHub

  2. Analogamente al punto precedente, per convenzione le validazioni personalizzate presenti nella directory validations dovrebbero essere racchiuse nel modulo Validations. Inoltre, alcune validazioni ereditano da EachValidator e dovrebbero essere accessibili senza namespace. Intendo spostarle in una directory separata e aggiungerle ai percorsi di autoload.

  3. Rimuovere tutti i require_dependency e assicurarsi che il progetto funzioni correttamente.

  4. Rimuovere tutti i require e assicurarsi che Discourse funzioni correttamente.

  5. Assicurarsi che tutti i plugin possano accedere alle dipendenze richieste. Non so ancora come realizzare ciò. Vorrei prima far funzionare Discourse senza alcun plugin.

Naturalmente, ci sono ancora molte incognite da risolvere. Terrò aggiornati sui progressi; tuttavia, se siete interessati a dare un’occhiata, ho iniziato a sperimentare qui: Commits · KrisKotlarek/discourse · GitHub

Fatemmi sapere se notate eventuali svantaggi nell’implementazione di Zeitwerk o se pensate che abbia tralasciato qualcosa.

14 Mi Piace
2

I made some progress around Zeitwerk, however, I changed my approach. My original plan was to change every place where Discourse is not following the Zeitwerk filename convention. After a few fixes, I realised that this is just the tip of the iceberg and noticed that if I am going to follow that path, then pull request will be difficult to read and confidently merge to master. For example, all job classes under regular directory should have Regular namespace, same with Onceoff and Scheduled.

I decided to step back a little bit and think about a more evolutionary approach than revolutionary.

I decided that it would be better to introduce custom Inflector, which will cover all files which are not following Zeitwerk convention. The biggest benefit will be that we would be able to deploy that small change and once we are happy with Zeitwerk and we don’t have any performance downgrades, we can start fixing convention file by file in reasonable small pull requests.

I found some problems which could not be sorted by custom Inflector, so I made additional fixes to make it work.

Pull request is still in progress, however, at this stage, I can run Discourse with Zeitwerk and default plugins, run all specs and run benchmark without a problem.

I wanted first to be at that stable state when all specs are passing. Now I can confidently start removing all require_dependency one by one and also test official plugins. Once everything is ready, I will share with you benchmark results in this post.

For now, if you are interested in progress you may take a look on that draft PR - DEV: Upgrading Discourse to Zeitwerk by KrisKotlarek · Pull Request #8098 · discourse/discourse · GitHub

The most important file is that custom Zeitwerk Inflector - DEV: Upgrading Discourse to Zeitwerk by KrisKotlarek · Pull Request #8098 · discourse/discourse · GitHub

10 Mi Piace
3

To make plugins work I needed to create a few more small pull requests. Once they are merged I think that specs on Discourse should pass.

I also checked performance on Rails 6.0.0 with Classic autoloader and Rails 6.0.0 with Zeitwerk.

Test Classic Zeitwerk Percent
categories-50 32 26 81.25
categories-75 37 29 78.38
categories-90 47 35 74.47
categories-99 67 49 73.13
home-50 30 29 96.67
home-75 37 31 83.78
home-90 44 40 90.91
home-99 67 52 77.61
topic-50 35 35 100.00
topic-75 36 36 100.00
topic-90 48 36 75.00
topic-99 57 58 101.75
categories_admin-50 51 48 94.12
categories_admin-75 62 50 80.65
categories_admin-90 89 66 74.16
categories_admin-99 135 101 74.81
home_admin-50 48 47 97.92
home_admin-75 58 49 84.48
home_admin-90 67 64 95.52
home_admin-99 101 81 80.20
topic_admin-50 48 48 100.00
topic_admin-75 55 49 89.09
topic_admin-90 63 65 103.17
topic_admin-99 92 69 75.00
load_rails 2617 2165 82.73
rss_kb 282428 315684 111.78
pss_kb 270491 303504 112.20

Results are not always consistent so I would take them with a grain of salt.

5 Mi Piace
4

The amount of inconsistency on the median here is a bit odd, I wonder why results are fluctuating so much

Surprised loader would have any impact

4 Mi Piace
5

I tried it once again, here are results

Test Classic Zeitwerk Percent
categories-50 25 25 100.00
categories-75 26 26 100.00
categories-90 37 33 89.19
categories-99 57 48 84.21
home-50 26 26 100.00
home-75 27 28 103.70
home-90 38 35 92.11
home-99 60 50 83.33
topic-50 27 26 96.30
topic-75 35 27 77.14
topic-90 41 33 80.49
topic-99 54 50 92.59
categories_admin-50 48 50 104.17
categories_admin-75 60 61 101.67
categories_admin-90 76 71 93.42
categories_admin-99 122 122 100.00
home_admin-50 47 46 97.87
home_admin-75 58 55 94.83
home_admin-90 66 63 95.45
home_admin-99 99 121 122.22
topic_admin-50 50 49 98.00
topic_admin-75 62 50 80.65
topic_admin-90 72 65 90.28
topic_admin-99 103 74 71.84
load_rails 2675 2216 82.84
rss_kb 279924 315240 112.62
pss_kb 267659 303026 113.21

We can try another way to benchmark. What would you say about more iterations, something which would run for an hour? In addition, instead of taking the best result, compare the average from each experiment. That may give more consistent numbers. What do you think?

1 Mi Piace
6

In my pull requests for plugins, you will notice that a lot of fixes are around searching in the global namespace.

I changed code like

module ::Jobs
  class TranslatorMigrateToAzurePortal < Jobs::Onceoff

to

module ::Jobs
  class TranslatorMigrateToAzurePortal < ::Jobs::Onceoff

One thing bothered me about that solution, why was it working before Zeitwerk. That question when something works but shouldn’t is always tricky :slight_smile:

I think I found a potential answer in the description of the classic autoloader (https://guides.rubyonrails.org/autoloading_and_reloading_constants_classic_mode.html#resolution-algorithms) - “If not found, then the algorithm walks up the ancestor chain of the cref”

Zeitwerk is more strict. Once I tried to load code before fix it was complaining that Jobs::Jobs::Onceoff can not be found.

Sam suggested under pull request FIX: Use top-level namespace for base classes · discourse/discourse-prometheus-alert-receiver@ef9c238 · GitHub, that instead of using < ::Jobs::Onceoff we can just use < Onceoff and he is right. I checked that without namespace it works as well. I am thinking that giving :: is explicitly saying that we are inheriting from Discourse Core class, however, we can go either way.

4 Mi Piace
7

I think that when the code is this close together, this reads great:

module ::Jobs
  class TranslatorMigrateToAzurePortal < Onceoff

If the code starts floating down being explicit makes more sense … eg:

module ::Jobs
  [ 50 lines omitted]
  class TranslatorMigrateToAzurePortal < ::Jobs::Onceoff

That said, I am on a fence here, so I am fine either way. ::Jobs::Onceoff is short enough and mega explicit so we can just go with that for now.

4 Mi Piace
8

I would love to start getting this merged. @kris.kotlarek is this now in a merge-able state? Timing is quite good cause we just had a beta

5 Mi Piace
10

Let me rebase recent master into that and ensure that it still works, I will do that today

6 Mi Piace
11

@sam I think we are good to go, I rebased with the latest master and made a small adjustment to Webauthn.
I checked 3 things:
run the server on local and click a little bit to ensure it works as expected
run specs
downloaded all official plugins and ensured that specs for plugins are passing (we need to merge adjustments for plugins first)

5 Mi Piace
12

Cool I am merging this. Let’s see what shakes out!

4 Mi Piace
13

Can we merge fixes for plugins as well? Otherwise, if you try to run Discourse with plugins it will fail

https://github.com/discourse/discourse-canned-replies/pull/51
https://github.com/discourse/discourse-cakeday/pull/29
https://github.com/discourse/discourse-voting/pull/45
https://github.com/discourse/discourse-perspective-api/pull/4
https://github.com/discourse/discourse-calendar/pull/4
https://github.com/discourse/discourse-prometheus/pull/4

4 Mi Piace
14

Please go ahead and merge away!

3 Mi Piace
16

This is now merged! If any plugin authors are struggling here, let us know in a new dedicated topic!

Great work Kris!!!

10 Mi Piace