Hi 
, I wrote this SimpleSAMLphp authentication module to be able to use Discourse as an SSO provider within a SimpleSAMLphp installation. I.e. you can use Discourse as an SSO provider for any services that supports SAML or Shibboleth authentication, which is really nice.
https://github.com/swcc/simplesamlphp-module-authdiscourse
Let me know what you think (if interested to comment on the code you can use Github Issues).
That’s great! If you’d like to make the module more visible, you could create a topic about it in our #plugin:extras category. That category is a directory of all extensions & integrations for Discourse which are not Discourse plugins,
EDIT: Mockup image added
I’m implementing this SSO on an existing web site and I just want to check how people are “presenting” their login method to users.
For example, let’s say my web site at www.example.com has a Login button in the top nav.
Should that login button instantly take people to my discourse login auth page? Or is it preferable to display a page / modal of information first, something like:
I’m just wondering if people will get confused if they’re not told what’s about to happen? 
Does anyone have any user experiences or best practices to share?
And thanks too by the way to @techAPJ for the very detailed first post in this thread, I was able to successfully build this in to my ASP.NET web site from scratch following your steps 
Is it possible to include a state parameter that gets returned unchanged, like as is done in OAuth? Asp.net core authentication middleware depends on generating a correlation id to prevent CSRF attacks, and I don’t currently have an easy way to include this.
Could you not add one to the querystring of your callback URL before you wrap it up?
Eg:
nonce=NONCE&return_sso_url=https://www.example.com/my/callback_url.aspx?myparam=here
@jessicah I tried this today and yes, it works fine.
' Create a Return URL
Dim strReturnURL As String = "https://www.example.com/authtestRETURNURL.aspx?myownparametershere=surewhynot"
' Generate a random nonce. Save it temporarily so that you can verify it with returned nonce value
Dim strNonce As String = Guid.NewGuid().ToString("N")
' Create a new payload with nonce and return url (where the Discourse will redirect user after verification)
' Payload should look like: nonce=NONCE&return_sso_url=RETURN_URL
Dim strPayload As String = "nonce=" & strNonce & "&return_sso_url=" & strReturnURL
Then on the page which is called back you’ll find this inside your decoded SSO query string:
&return_sso_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.example.com%2FauthtestRETURNURL.aspx%3Fmyownparametershere%3Dsurewhynot&username=RichHopefully this is what you meant?
Multi-site approaches to using discourse-auth-proxy?
Are there any examples or recommendations for using Discourse as SSO provider for multi-site authentication?
It seems like the there are two basic multisite approaches:
I think either of these could work, but the issue with these two approaches, is
that you still require logging into each different site.
There is also the risk that something is stored in Postgres that will get overwritten by each login from the different sites. ie: site1.com. site2.com
(I don’t know the details of Discourse auth/PG schema, so I don’t know)
What would be ideal is a way to have login performed once, which gets you logged into all the sites in the multi-site group. ie, site1.com, site2.com, site3.com
Apparently Stackoverflow does this using a combination of localSession storage and Iframes as the main enabler. tech description
But I’d really love to know if someone has implemented any approach to
multisite login using Discourse as the SSO provider.
approach 1: multiple instances of discourse-auth-proxy
approach 2: hacked discourse-auth-proxy affecting return_sso_url in payload.
approach 3: #1 or #2 implemented such that logging in once, means you do not have to login again when moving from site1.com to site2.com
I am tagging you @sam, since you originally authored the Go discourse-auth-proxy program.
Hi.
I am stucking at how the provider handle the + sign in return sso url.
In my case, my DiscourseConnect consumer will create a return_sso_url like
http://example.com/foo/bar?wpLoginToken=123+\
http%3A%2F%2Fexample.com%2Ffoo%2Fbar%3FwpLoginToken%3D123%2B%5C
then DiscourseConnect will return to
http://example.com/foo/bar?wpLoginToken=123%20\&sso=foo&sig=barhttp://example.com/foo/bar?wpLoginToken=123+\&sso=foo&sig=barThe problem is that the return to url will be handle by the urldecode function in PHP(it’s the core workflow in MediaWiki Authentication), and the wpLoginToken value will be unexpected change from 123+\ to 123 \.
Look like i has found the cause:
https://ruby-doc.org/stdlib-2.7.1/libdoc/uri/rdoc/URI.html#method-c-decode_www_form
https://www.php.net/manual/en/function.urlencode.php
Well, the client and server implement encode/decode but follow different specification.
I’m not asking Discourse to change but looking for advice to resolve this.
Thanks.
Edit:
I resolve it just urlencode the + sign twice.
Thanks!
I’m trying this presently. I sent you two PRs on GitHub, one for refreshing the docs and one for fixing a bug I hit.
In Settings > Login, the two DiscourseConnect provider settings are not consecutive, and appear interspersed with the DiscourseConnect settings:
Since the provider and the non-provider settings are for opposite use cases—using Discourse to manage users for something else versus using something else to manage users for Discourse—displaying these settings mixed together invites misconfiguration. It would be less confusing if the two provider settings were consecutive and either entirely before or entirely after the non-provider settings.
@techAPJ Can this be used with AWS Cognito? I want to create an app in AWS Amplify for my discourse community and want my app to be authenticated through discourse.
Sorry for the very delayed reply. You’re absolutely right - it’s confusing that they’re interspersed like that. I’ve cleaned it up in this PR:
@mdoggydog Thanks for the recent update to the DiscourseSsoConsumer MediaWiki extension. We’d been puzzling over what to do about users being logged out of our wiki without having logged out of Discourse, and $wgPluggableAuth_EnableAutoLogin was definitely not what we wanted, since it prevents anonymous access to the wiki. The $wgDiscourseSsoConsumer_AutoRelogin setting you added is exactly what we needed.
Hello 
there!
I am trying to use the PHP example from the original post, but the way they’re storing stuff doesn’t make sense. They’re just storing values in an SQL database with the keys login and nonce. If I want to use SQL to store the nonces what would my SQL database look like exactly?
Some other info that might help is what I’m using this for - I am hoping to link a Discourse user to a Minecraft account by generating an SSO link which is tied to their UUID. Upon successfully logging in with Discourse, I’m going to store their UUID and Discourse ID in a table.
So far, I was able to get the PHP example working, but I guess I’m not fully understanding how I’d have to modify it to work for my use-case. Ideally, I want to generate the link through a GET request and send it to the user, so the UUID is already associated with the nonce.
Thank you for this post, as I would be even more lost without it!
Edit: For nonces would I just be better off storing nonces in the table and look up by that? I know I need to match the nonce but, unless I can pass additional information through in the redirect URL (which I haven’t been successful doing so) I’m not sure how to reference the nonce properly.
I have created a guide that allow admin to configure DiscourseConnect into standard SAML protocol via SimpleSAMLphp.
/session/sso_provider?sso=bm9uY2U9NDA3YTVlNjg1ZTEwMDlh...
I’m not sure why it will 502 bad gateway.
I edited out some of the value of the sso param that you had provided. Unless someone knew your secret key they would not be able to decode the value, but it still seemed safer to not provide the full value. It won’t be related to the 502 error that you are getting.
It seems a databse error. Because I try the same plugin and configuration in another discourse website, and it’s working. How can I fix this problem?
It seems that trying to authenticate into discourse-auth-proxy with non-ASCII usernames or group names (Chinese in my case) leads to an error due to cookies cannot contain these characters. This is my fix: (disclaimer: I’m not really familiar with golang)
diff --git a/main.go b/main.go
index 1b1dc28..18f8c9e 100644
--- a/main.go
+++ b/main.go
@@ -154,7 +154,12 @@ func redirectIfNoCookie(handler http.Handler, r *http.Request, w http.ResponseWr
var username, groups string
if err == nil && cookie != nil {
- username, groups, err = parseCookie(cookie.Value, config.CookieSecret)
+ var value string
+ value, err = url.QueryUnescape(cookie.Value)
+ if err != nil {
+ return
+ }
+ username, groups, err = parseCookie(value, config.CookieSecret)
}
if err == nil {
@@ -224,7 +229,7 @@ func redirectIfNoCookie(handler http.Handler, r *http.Request, w http.ResponseWr
cookieData := strings.Join([]string{username, strings.Join(groups, "|")}, ",")
http.SetCookie(w, &http.Cookie{
Name: cookieName,
- Value: signCookie(cookieData, config.CookieSecret),
+ Value: url.QueryEscape(signCookie(cookieData, config.CookieSecret)),
Expires: expiration,
HttpOnly: true,
Path: "/",
Thanks for reporting! Would you mind making a PR against the github repository so that we can merge this change into the official version?