Bouton de vote apparaît sur le premier message

[Chandra]

Continuant la discussion de Discourse Post Voting :

Puisque le premier message dans un sujet Q&R est la question elle-même, il ne devrait pas avoir d’option de vote positif.

[icaria36]

N’est-ce pas une fonctionnalité permettant de prioriser les sujets ?

Je suis d’accord que, pour l’instant, il est confus et peu clair pourquoi quelqu’un devrait voter pour un sujet.

[volanar]

Sur le premier post, ceci est superflu et doit être supprimé

[JammyDodger]

J’ai déplacé votre publication ici @volanar car elle a déjà été mentionnée.

Je pensais qu’il y avait une réponse disant que c’était intentionnel, mais je ne la trouve pas. Je vais chercher et voir ce que je peux trouver.

[Canapin (Coin-coin le Canapin)]

@icaria36

Je suis d’accord que, pour le moment, il est déroutant et peu clair pourquoi quelqu’un devrait voter pour un sujet.

En guise de solution de contournement, vous pouvez utiliser ce CSS :

.post-stream .topic-post:first-child .post-voting-post {
    display: none;
}

[sam (Sam Saffron)]

@volanar

Sur le premier post, ceci est superflu et doit être supprimé.

C’est très largement une préférence du site. Voter sur la qualité des questions est quelque chose d’assez établi sur des sites comme Stack Overflow.

Nous avons délibérément conservé le contrôle du vote, le supprimer via CSS est cependant possible, ouvert à l’ajout d’un paramètre de site pour cela également.

[volanar]

@sam

C’est tout à fait une préférence de site. Voter sur la qualité des questions est quelque chose d’assez établi sur les sites de type Stack Overflow.

Mais la question elle-même ne peut pas participer au vote parmi les réponses. De plus, elle ne peut pas être filtrée avec les réponses. Elle devrait toujours être en haut.

[JammyDodger]

@sam

C’est tout à fait une préférence de site. Voter sur la qualité des questions est quelque chose d’assez établi sur les sites de type Stack Overflow.

Je me demande si styliser différemment celui dans l’OP aiderait à montrer qu’il a une signification différente de ceux dans les réponses ?

[Catija]

@sam

This is very much a site pref. Voting on quality of questions is something pretty established on Stack Overflow like sites.

We kept the voting control deliberately, removing it via CSS is fine though, open to maybe adding a site setting for it as well.

Voting on questions is something that I think is really worth discussion in the context of Discourse. I have a bit of experience with SO-like sites and I’d like to do a bit of thinking about whether votes are useful for questions on post-voting type topics here at all (for brevity, I’m just calling these “questions” from here on out).

You are correct that on platforms that are solely Q&A (e.g. Stack Overflow), there are specific things that question votes (up and down) are used for. In particular:

• indicating question quality or that you have the same question/can understand the need for such a question
• searching/sorting/filtering questions by score
• indicating the question is in/out of scope for the site
• hiding particularly low-quality content
• enabling deletion by non-moderator users
• rewarding/penalizing users for posting good/bad questions with reputation/karma.

As far as I’m aware, these don’t really apply to Discourse currently, whether using this plugin or not. I know the feature is relatively new but I’m curious how many of these Q&A features are things you’d want to make use of in Discourse. On the surface, it seems like a huge paradigm shift from the current trust level system and other moderation practices.

If your main goal in adding these question types is to allow communities to easily create/host their own SE-style sites where the primary purpose is more structured Q&A rather than discussions, that’s really interesting and I’d love to hear more about it… but I’ve learned a lot in my time at SO that has led me to question some of its core functionality to the point I’d outright discourage replicating many aspects of SO if I were building it from scratch.

When thinking about a hybrid system like a Discourse community running the post voting plugin would be, I don’t honestly know whether voting on questions makes sense at all. I admit that I don’t know a ton about the feature and how it’s implemented but I have poked around with it somewhat and read what posts I could here to learn about it, which has led me to this conclusion.

What value does question votes add in Discourse?

I understand the plugin has been official for less than a year and is likely still in flux. I won’t profess to be an expert in Discourse moderation, features, or scope by any stretch (feel free to correct any errors I make) but it seems that the status-quo uses different (and possibly better) solutions, which render many reasons for question scores unnecessary.

TL;DR - Read the stuff in bold.

#	Feature	Use on SO	Use on Discourse	Useful?
1	Notifications for votes	Upvotes notify poster of reputation change. There isn’t a Like feature on SO.	Votes do not create a notification for the asker but Likes do.	While it’s likely easy to add upvote notifications to Discourse, why have both? Likes are one of the primary reasons question votes seem unnecessary here. [1]
2	Vote impact on askers (reputation)	Reputation is how privileges are awarded on SO and users’ reputation is a major aspect of their status. Earning rep from well-received questions is one of the only ways users who only ask questions can gain privileges.	There is nothing like reputation. Privileges are awarded through the trust level system, which emphasizes and rewards simply reading content for TL 1. Votes on Q&A style posts seem to count as Likes, which are absent from both question and answers.	The direct tie between post creation, reputation, and privileges is the aspect of SO I most wish to change. Users should have multiple avenues to earn privileges that don’t require content creation. If users don’t need question votes to earn TLs, they seem unnecessary.
3	Vote impact on askers (non-rep)	One aspect of the non-public, automatic SO recidivism system (that cannot be overridden by mods) relies in part on question score to block future questions from users who consistently post poorly-received questions. SO doesn’t have a way to require preview of content before it’s live on site.	Moderators use tooling to manually silence, suspend or override the user’s TL rather than there being any automations. There are settings that can be used to require moderator review of new posts in some cases but aren’t based on post reception.	Considering SO’s scale and prioritization of allowing anyone to ask questions, the use of automated question bans for users is understandable (though the system needs an overhaul [2]). Relying on existing TL-based post restrictions and use of flags makes question score unnecessary for user moderation.
4	Score impact on posts	Low-scoring questions are hidden from the front page and more easily deleted by trusted users or automations. Some flag types can delete the question if enough of them are received. All flags of the same type are weighted equally, regardless of who cast the flag.	There’s a robust extant system to automatically close, hide, and delete posts based on flags, which also draws moderator attention to flagged posts. Flags from users with good flagging history are weighted more than flags from users who do not.	The existing system seems incredibly well balanced. By using past flags to weight new ones, users are incentivised to be accurate in their flagging. In contrast, using un-weighted votes to hide/delete content can be misused and doesn’t take past voting into account. Relying on votes to moderate posts is unnecessary in conjunction with the existing flagging system.
5	Question sorting/ filtering	Question score, answer count, accept status are clearly indicated in all question list views. Search can use question score to filter and sort results on user request. All topics are Q&A, so no syntax is needed to find Q&A only. Search includes syntax to return questions only.	Question score isn’t shown in topic lists but solved status and response count is shown. Results can be sorted by Likes (which includes votes). There’s no way to return Q&A topics only. The in:first syntax seems like it would return questions only.	Adding search syntax for post type (Q&A vs discussion and question vs answer/response) seems valuable, though tangential. (This feature request post to show question score on the topic list) could be useful but Likes could stand in for question score in topic lists or you could decline the FR and keep the UI as-is.
6	Upvote meaning	The question upvote hover text states “This question shows research effort; it is useful and clear”. The first half is up for debate and the second half is subjective and ambiguous. Users likely vote on questions for many reasons including, “I had the same question!”, which arguably falls under “useful” but subject experts may decide simple but common questions aren’t useful (to them) and downvote. [3] [4]	Undefined. There’s no UI directions about when to vote and that’s understandable since it’s a new feature and each community may want to encourage voting for different reasons than others. The familiar Like feature is absent in this topic format. While Likes may default to hearts only, communities can configure additional reactions.	Even in communities that manage to find consensus about when to vote, question vote reasons are frequently more subjective and broad than answer votes reasons, which almost always mean “this is correct” or “I agree with this”. Likes, particularly when communities add a variety of reaction options, can better explain why someone votes on a question than pure up/down votes.
7	Downvote meaning	Ask 10 people when to downvote a question on SO and you’ll likely get 10 different answers, half of which will be “wrong” and many would be better addressed by editing, flagging, closing, or commenting. Underuse of these features leads to askers posting on Meta to express confusion and frustration at their question being downvoted without explanation and asking that such votes be prohibited. [5]	Similarly understandably undefined. Most question issues can likely be addressed more effectively by using comments to point out actionable changes or recommendations, using the flag option on questions to DM the asker, or flagging for moderators. The default heart wouldn’t make sense with the negative connotation of downvoting.	People hate getting downvotes, even when platforms go to great lengths to avoid letting users know they were downvoted. This is often more painful for question askers, who are looking for help and being vulnerable by sharing that they’re stuck and frustrated at people they interpret as unhelpful or obstructing. Question downvotes can be the easy response but don’t help askers improve. By leaning on other tools, you encourage communication rather than alienation.

Adapting library features to your community’s home

I recognize the urge to follow patterns established by existing platforms - particularly ones you helped build - but my big takeaway about communities on SE/SO is that most (new) users assume SE is more like a forum and frequently struggle with their first question’s reception, particularly when it comes to closure and voting. Asking questions on SO is stress-inducing for many people… the internet is full of references to SO that tell them their question will either be completely ignored or harshly judged by self-appointed platform and subject matter experts who have arcane and capricious expectations for what qualifies as a programming question… and a lot of people don’t want that.

What they have frequently stated they want was smaller, closer communities where they know people, can make connections and ask for help without being made to feel like an idiot. In a lot of ways, I think Discourse is that. By having a broader format that encourages open-ended and subjective topics while also supporting a more classical Q&A format, you allow communities to support each other the way they wish.

Even if SO were the best possible way to create and curate a knowledge library (it’s not), Discourse isn’t (and shouldn’t be) trying to be that kind of resource. Your homepage sells Discourse as “The online home for your community”. When I want my kids to feel at home, I encourage and nurture their questions and make room for them to join in the conversation. When I take them to a library, I frequently have to remind them to be quiet and prevent them from treating the shelves like a jungle gym.

In my mind, question voting is something that may be necessary for a library but probably isn’t for a home - and it may negatively impact how much people enjoy their home.

Armchair PMing time

This section is significantly less important than the giant table above, so if you haven’t read that, go read it instead. The table explains how I’m getting to this summary but will also reveal any issues due to bad info on my part - as a reminder, I’m not a Discourse expert - I keep checking to make sure I don’t write “Discord” instead.

• Remove question voting - If people really want something more like SO’s pure Q&A, it could be an setting but I’d default it to off.
• Reinstate Likes on questions - give people a friendly way to react/support questions. Consider offering some default reactions that suit questions, both positive and negative.
  • I understand wanting the consistency of either Likes or votes on the same topic but I think it’s worth mixing them and Discourse users are used to likes already… in fact…
• Investigate the value of Likes on answers in addition to votes and comments. Reactions can feel more friendly than votes and some people may want to indicate more than the binary up/down without writing a comment. If votes and likes are already being used to sort search results, maybe there’s a way to use both when determining answer order - similar to flag scores in the review queue.
• Keep voting on answers - answer votes serve the primary purpose of ranking solutions to a single question and both up- and downvotes are vital, even if they may cause some stress.

---

1. I understand wanting to avoid mixing Likes and votes on the same topic. ↩︎

2. Anecdotally, some users may overuse downvotes on questions with the goal of getting askers q-banned sooner, which can also make it harder to get unbanned. In such systems, it’s imperative to consider unintended consequences and find ways to minimize them. ↩︎

3. I could give a Ted talk on question voting on SO, but I’ll say that many SO users seem to have forgotten the “library of information” concept and the “shows research effort” hover text has exacerbated that. A great library has all of the information. It’s silly to refuse adding something to your library simply because it’s in the library two towns over. ↩︎

4. Also, don’t even get me started on “Voting is different on meta” - though, since my solution is merging Discourse and Q&A, maybe it’d at least be on topic. ↩︎

5. Regardless of what people say on SO, downvotes feel personal, even if they’re not intended to be taken that way. ↩︎

[jericson (Jon Ericson)]

@Catija

Quand je veux que mes enfants se sentent à l’aise, j’encourage et nourris leurs questions et je leur laisse la place de participer à la conversation. Quand je les emmène à la bibliothèque, je dois souvent leur rappeler de se taire et les empêcher de traiter les étagères comme un terrain de jeu.

J’adore cette analogie. Je dois noter que ma maison est parfois traitée comme une bibliothèque (quand les enfants font leurs devoirs) et que la bibliothèque peut parfois être plus une aire de jeux (quand ils organisent des événements communautaires). Mais le défaut compte. Discourse, pour le meilleur ou pour le pire, a pour défaut d’être un forum de discussion plus détendu. C’est collaboratif plutôt qu’adversarial. Q&R sera l’exception pour la plupart des communautés Discourse.

@Catija

Les gens détestent recevoir des votes négatifs, même lorsque les plateformes font de grands efforts pour éviter que les utilisateurs sachent qu’ils ont reçu des votes négatifs. C’est souvent plus douloureux pour les demandeurs, qui cherchent de l’aide et se montrent vulnérables en partageant qu’ils sont bloqués et frustrés par des personnes qu’ils interprètent comme inutiles ou obstructives.

J’ai des sentiments mitigés. Je pense que les votes négatifs peuvent être une façon plus gentille d’exprimer son désaccord que les alternatives. Ayant reçu beaucoup de plaintes concernant les votes négatifs, la principale préoccupation des gens est que les votes négatifs anonymes semblent injustes dans le contexte d’un système de réputation connecté. Les gens veulent savoir pourquoi ils ont reçu des votes négatifs. En apparence, ils veulent savoir pour pouvoir résoudre le problème. En réalité, je soupçonne que la plupart veulent se disputer avec la personne qui a voté négativement et qu’il n’y a rien sur quoi s’accrocher pour argumenter. C’est généralement une bonne chose car ces arguments sont rarement productifs.

Les votes négatifs, en particulier sur les questions, s’intègrent plus difficilement dans Discourse étant donné la nature collaborative de la plupart des forums. Je ne suis pas sûr que le vote sur les questions serait quelque chose que les gens voudraient si cela était développé sans l’exemple de Stack Overflow. Dans un monde idéalisé, les votes refléteraient la qualité de la question :

• Explique-t-elle clairement le problème ?
• Fournit-elle suffisamment de contexte pour que d’autres puissent explorer le problème ?
• Va-t-elle droit au but et évite-t-elle les antécédents inutiles ?
• Relève-t-elle du domaine d’expertise de la communauté ?

La dure réalité est que les votes sur les questions ont tendance à refléter les sentiments de la communauté envers la question. Si vous posez une question sur l’erreur NullPointerException sur Stack Overflow, vous allez passer un mauvais moment, peu importe la qualité de votre question. Elle a déjà été posée un million de fois et les gens ne sont pas intéressés par une autre version de la question.

C’est peut-être une caractéristique du vote sur les questions et non un bug. Si c’est le cas, c’est une caractéristique qui a du sens lorsqu’il y a tellement de questions que la communauté ne peut pas suivre. Ce n’est pas une caractéristique qui aide les communautés nouvellement formées ou les communautés qui sont généralement des forums collaboratifs qui plongent occasionnellement dans le Q&R. En d’autres termes, je ne suis pas sûr que le vote sur les questions aide un très grand nombre de communautés Discourse. Je pense donc que ce devrait être un paramètre qui, par défaut, est “désactivé”.

J’ai récemment suggéré le vote sur les publications à un client qui collectait des questions pour une vidéo AMA. L’ancien système consistait à prendre les X meilleures questions soumises selon les likes. La personne qui posait les questions n’avait pas de moyen facile de trier les réponses à la demande de questions. Le vote sur les publications fonctionne très bien pour cela car les réponses sont triées automatiquement. Le vote sur les questions inclus, cependant, est inutile et déroutant. De nombreuses personnes visitent la communauté afin de soumettre leurs questions pour l’AMA. Les likes seraient un signal utile. Les votes négatifs ? Probablement un clic accidentel ou une expérimentation de la nouvelle fonctionnalité. Je vais le supprimer via CSS cet après-midi.^[1]

---

1. Il y a quelques autres ajustements que je dois faire pour qu’il fonctionne avec leur thème, donc c’est aussi bien d’en profiter pour corriger cette nuisance. ↩︎

[denvergeeks]

Si je voulais permettre de voter sur la question elle-même, serait-il judicieux d’utiliser le plugin Topic Voting ? Ou est-ce que je me trompe ?