Asunto diferente para notificaciones por correo electrónico que incluyen una @mención

This is probably a holdover from folks that are using Discourse in a similar manner to old email listservs, but what I’m noticing is that many users signup for email notifications and then build a rule to shuttle them to a specific mail folder. Sometimes they look at the folder, sometimes they don’t.

At issue is when someone @mentions a user in a post, the Subject for the @mentioned notification is the same as any other for example, this message contained an @mention of my username:

[CLC-ListServ] [Staff] This is a test of a large image

I was wondering if email notifications that were @mentions to the user in question could have something added to their subject line, like:

[CLC-ListServ] [Staff] [@mention] This is a test of a large image.

That way we could inform users that they should build mail filters that treated these messages differently, so they were less likely to just end up in one of their Bacn folders.

4 Me gusta

No plans for this at the moment. In three years this is the first time I have ever heard the request.

Sometimes it takes a while for someone to come up with a great idea. :slight_smile:

Seriously, though, in my community we are also struggling with people who are intimidated with discourse and rely on their email to keep up with discussions and to reply. Then discourse competes with all the rest of the information overload they grapple with daily, and the old school strategies they use (like filtering into folders) means that messages get lost.

The answer seems to be to get these people to log into discourse, but it’s an uphill battle. In the meantime, any tricks to help them to pay attention to the posts that matter, that show up in their email, are welcome.

2 Me gusta

We’ve been running our Discourse instance for over a year and this only came up recently. I think that as the number of posts has ramped up in our community, some folks have started building up their mail filters.

I noticed this because in the past month or so several times when I’d @mentioned people, I would NOT hear back from them. I checked Mandrill, saw they got a message. When I got in touch with them, they said they missed the @mention because they hadn’t reviewed the folders where the email notifications are going.

Actually this is another area where Discourse could offer something more than a traditional email listserv. To my knowledge, a traditional listserv doesn’t distinguish a @mentioned message from a list message in the subject either.

I wouldn’t classify this as a vital feature, but rather an added bonus.

2 Me gusta

¡Hola!

Sin esta función, ¿cómo distinguen los usuarios los correos electrónicos normales de las respuestas a sus mensajes (para poder omitir la bandeja de entrada de los correos normales y no de aquellos en los que están involucrados)? Con las listas de correo tradicionales, eso era fácil, ya que eres el remitente del mensaje original y también sueles estar al menos en copia, y de esta manera puedes filtrar usando tu propia dirección de correo electrónico. Pero con Discourse, soy el destinatario de todos los mensajes y no veo nada más que pueda usar en un filtro…

@wesochuck ¿Encontraste una solución para esto?

Nunca se me ocurrió ninguna solución alternativa, todavía es lo que consideraría una limitación de la plataforma de correo electrónico de Discourse.

Pero… sin votos positivos en 10 años, no debe ser un problema generalizado.

PD Específicamente para la @mención de tu nombre de usuario, probablemente podrías crear tu filtro de correo electrónico para buscarlo en el cuerpo del correo electrónico. Pero eso no captaría ninguna respuesta directa que pudieras tener a un hilo de tema que no incluya tu nombre de usuario.

1 me gusta

Eso no es del todo cierto, porque la votación de las solicitudes de funciones es bastante nueva. Pero la falta de publicaciones nos dice algo.

1 me gusta