When I use the direct-delivery email receivership setup as per this, I end up with the following errors in logs that consist of both a failure with LetsEncrypt and an incoming test to “firstname.lastname@example.org” from a Gmail account:
<22> postfix/master: daemon started -- version 3.1.1, configuration /etc/postfix
<20> postfix/smtpd: warning: cannot get RSA private key from file "/letsencrypt/domain.tld/prop.ltcmp.net.key": disabling TLS support
<20> postfix/smtpd: warning: TLS library problem: error:02001002:system library:fopen:No such file or directory:bss_file.c:402:fopen('/letsencrypt/domain.tld/prop.ltcmp.net.key','r'):
<20> postfix/smtpd: warning: TLS library problem: error:20074002:BIO routines:FILE_CTRL:system lib:bss_file.c:404:
<20> postfix/smtpd: warning: TLS library problem: error:140B0002:SSL routines:SSL_CTX_use_PrivateKey_file:system lib:ssl_rsa.c:633:
<22> postfix/smtpd: connect from mail-qk1-f180.google.com[126.96.36.199]
<22> postfix/smtpd: lost connection after STARTTLS from mail-qk1-f180.google.com[188.8.131.52]
<22> postfix/cleanup: 20A0CBCE22: message-id=<20191115221116.20A0CBCE22@discourse-mail-receiver.localdomain>
<22> postfix/qmgr: 20A0CBCE22: from=<email@example.com>, size=900, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
<22> postfix/smtpd: disconnect from mail-qk1-f180.google.com[184.108.40.206] ehlo=1 starttls=0/1 commands=1/2
<22> postfix/smtp: 20A0CBCE22: to=<firstname.lastname@example.org>, orig_to=<postmaster>, relay=none, delay=0.01, delays=0.01/0/0/0, dsn=5.4.4, status=bounced (Name service error for name=discourse-mail-receiver.localdomain type=AAAA: Malformed or unexpected name server reply)
<20> postfix/bounce: warning: 20A0CBCE22: undeliverable postmaster notification discarded
<22> postfix/qmgr: 20A0CBCE22: removed
My configuration is such that I do have another mail server on
mail.domain.tld, but Discourse runs directly at
discourse.domain.tld is also the hostname of the Docker server thats’ running both the Discourse +
I also have the following mx records:
domain.tld > mail.domain.tld priority: 10
d > discourse.domain.tld priority: 20
domain.tld > discourse.domain.tld priority: 30
What could be going wrong here?
One thing I noticed, obviously, was that
/letsencrypt/domain.tld/prop.ltcmp.net.key was missing from the contents of the folder:
discourse-mail-receiver:/# ls -tlrha letsencrypt/domain.tld
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3.2K Nov 10 05:10 domain.tld.key
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 208 Nov 10 05:10 domain.tld.csr.conf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.6K Nov 10 05:10 domain.tld.csr
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.2K Nov 10 05:10 domain.tld.cer
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3.8K Nov 10 05:10 fullchain.cer
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.6K Nov 10 05:10 ca.cer
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4.0K Nov 10 05:10 .
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 799 Nov 11 15:56 domain.tld.conf
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4.0K Nov 11 27 15:56 backup
drwxr-xr-x 8 root root 4.0K Nov 16 00:49 ..
It’s interesting since this goes back to this question here by @surety that seems to have not received a direct answer.
The thread there seems to continue to discuss this point, but there’s so much chatter in that thread now that things can become confusing and thus why I’ve created a topic here (to achieve greater clarity for future users with such trouble).
It appears as though the
mail-receiver.yml config’s entry
POSTCONF_smtpd_tls_key_file's value of
/letsencrypt/domain.tld/prop.ltcmp.net.key must be replaced with
So the answer to @surety’s #1 question is “YES” this is correct to replace this entry’s contents with the one that you see. #2 also seems correct to leave as default.
I believe that perhaps either @pfaffman or @mpalmer probably should retool the container creation script to have the correct .key file instead of this (apparent wrong)
At this point I am now fortunately able to move on from and past @mpalmer’s step:
You can also now try sending an e-mail to
email@example.com . While Discourse won’t do anything useful with it yet, the e-mail you sent should show up in your admin panel under “Emails”, “Rejected” in a matter of seconds. If that happens, you’re definitely ready to proceed.
Since now my test email is showing up in the Discourse
I thought it was obvious that
prop.ltcmp.net was a place-holder just like
Between the move to Debian and the new mail receiver, there could be some other changes needed. I’ll try to have a look in the next few days, as my install scripts may have been broken by these updates.
Interesting, why do you think this is obviously seen as just a placeholder? Should the acronyms be self-evident? If so, then perhaps let’s make it even more self evident with something more like:
This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.