Discourse AI - 감정

:bookmark: 이 주제는 Discourse AI 플러그인의 감정(Sentiment) 기능 설정에 대해 다루고 있습니다.

:person_raising_hand: 필요한 사용자 권한: модератор(Moderator)

감정(Sentiment) 기능은 게시물을 분석하여 감정 점수와 정서 점수를 제공함으로써 특정 기간 동안 커뮤니티의 전반적인 분위기를 파악할 수 있도록 도와줍니다. 이러한 인사이트는 커뮤니티 내에서 게시물을 작성하고 상호작용하는 사용자의 유형을 파악하는 데 유용할 수 있습니다.

기능

  • 전반적인 감정: 긍정적 또는 부정적으로 분류된 게시물의 수를 비교합니다.
  • 긍정, 부정, 전반적인 점수의 수치를 토글하여 표시하는 막대 그래프
  • 감정(Emotion): 여러 감정으로 분류된 주제 및 게시물의 수를 시간 범위로 그룹화하여 표시
    • 오늘
    • 어제
    • 지난 7일
    • 지난 30일
  • 설정을 통해 접근할 수 있는 임의의 기간에 대한 보고서
    • 연도별
    • 분기별
    • 월별
    • 주별
    • 사용자 지정 범위
  • 모든 스태프 사용자(관리자 및 модератор)가 접근 가능

감정(Sentiment) 활성화

설정

감정(Sentiment)은 호스팅 고객에게 기본적으로 활성화되어 있습니다. 수동 단계는 아래를 참조하세요.

  1. Admin 설정 → Plugins로 이동하여 discourse-ai를 검색하거나 찾아 활성화되어 있는지 확인하세요.
  2. 감정 분석을 위해 ai_sentiment_enabled을 활성화하세요.
  3. /admin/dashboard/sentiment로 이동하여 해당 보고서를 확인하세요.

:information_source: 활성화되면, Sentiment는 5분마다 실행되는 예약 작업을 통해 모든 새 게시물과 지난 60일 간의 게시물을 자동으로 분류하고 백필(backfill)합니다. 60일 이전의 게시물을 백필하려면 ai_sentiment_backfill_post_max_age_days 사이트 설정을 증가시키세요.

:discourse2: 우리가 호스팅을 하고 있나요?

백필 설정 조정에 도움이 필요하면 team@discourse.org로 문의해 주세요.

:mechanic: 자체 호스팅을 하고 계신가요?

원하는 시간 범위를 포함하도록 사이트 설정에서 ai_sentiment_backfill_post_max_age_days를 증가시키세요. 예약된 백필 작업이 오래된 게시물을 자동으로 처리합니다. 필요한 모델 엔드포인트 설정에 대한 자세한 내용은 DiscourseAI를 위한 자체 호스팅 Sentiment 및 Emotion을 참조하세요.

기술적 FAQ

주제/게시물 데이터는 어떻게 처리되며, 점수는 어떻게 할당되나요?

  • Sentiment는 “게시물별” 정밀도를 가집니다. 각 게시물에 대해 감정을 파악한 후, 해당 데이터를 다양한 형태로(태그별 / 카테고리별 / 시간별 등…) 분할할 수 있습니다. 이는 긍정적 또는 부정적으로 분류된 게시물의 수를 비교합니다. 이러한 값은 긍정 또는 부정 점수가 고정 임계값인 0.6을 초과할 때 계산됩니다(현재는 설정할 수 없음).

다른 언어에 대한 지원 추가 계획이 있나요?

  • 네, 미래에 추가할 계획입니다! 전용 모델 대신 다국어 단순 기계 학습(ML) 모델을 추가하거나 다국어 대규모 언어 모델(LLMs)을 사용하여 데이터를 분류하는 방식으로 지원할 예정입니다.

Sentiment를 구동하는 데 어떤 모델이 사용되나요?

주의 사항

  • 중립(긍정도 부정도 아님)으로 분류된 게시물은 표시되지 않습니다.
  • 개인 메시지(PM)는 계산에서 제외됩니다.
10개의 좋아요

A post was merged into an existing topic: Problems with Sentiment Backfill

A post was merged into an existing topic: Problems with Sentiment Backfill

The OP has been updated with a new video showcasing the updated features of Sentiment including a ton more emotions and understanding which topics/posts are associated with each emotion

I configured the sentiment model config with a model_name, endpoint, and api_key copied from the LLM settings, where it passes the test, but I get the error below in /logs.

(But maybe I don’t understand correctly, because why doesn’t sentiment use one of the configured LLMs?)

Using claude-3-5-sonnet.


{"type":"error","error":{"type":"invalid_request_error","message":"anthropic-version: header is required"}} (Net::HTTPBadResponse)
/var/www/discourse/plugins/discourse-ai/lib/inference/hugging_face_text_embeddings.rb:71:in `classify'
/var/www/discourse/plugins/discourse-ai/lib/sentiment/post_classification.rb:142:in `request_with'
/var/www/discourse/plugins/discourse-ai/lib/sentiment/post_classification.rb:78:in `block (4 levels) in bulk_classify!'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/concurrent-ruby-1.3.5/lib/concurrent-ruby/concurrent/promises.rb:1593:in `evaluate_to'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/concurrent-ruby-1.3.5/lib/concurrent-ruby/concurrent/promises.rb:1776:in `block in on_resolvable'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/concurrent-ruby-1.3.5/lib/concurrent-ruby/concurrent/executor/ruby_thread_pool_executor.rb:359:in `run_task'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/concurrent-ruby-1.3.5/lib/concurrent-ruby/concurrent/executor/ruby_thread_pool_executor.rb:350:in `block (3 levels) in create_worker'
<internal:kernel>:187:in `loop'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/concurrent-ruby-1.3.5/lib/concurrent-ruby/concurrent/executor/ruby_thread_pool_executor.rb:341:in `block (2 levels) in create_worker'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/concurrent-ruby-1.3.5/lib/concurrent-ruby/concurrent/executor/ruby_thread_pool_executor.rb:340:in `catch'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/concurrent-ruby-1.3.5/lib/concurrent-ruby/concurrent/executor/ruby_thread_pool_executor.rb:340:in `block in create_worker'
Status: 400

{"type":"error","error":{"type":"invalid_request_error","message":"anthropic-version: header is required"}} (Net::HTTPBadResponse)
/var/www/discourse/plugins/discourse-ai/lib/inference/hugging_face_text_embeddings.rb:71:in `classify'
/var/www/discourse/plugins/discourse-ai/lib/sentiment/post_classification.rb:142:in `request_wit...

The sentiment module doesn’t use general LLMs, but models specifically fine tuned to sentiment classification. If you want to run those models on your own that is documented at Self-Hosting Sentiment and Emotion for DiscourseAI

3개의 좋아요

@Falco I just noticed the sentiment has stopped running as of Jan 2025. My guess that there’s this new setting ai_sentiment_model which as the above link explains if for running your own dedicated sentiment model/image. I noticed that after updating discourse now ai_sentiment_model_configs is all blank (should it be blank?).

When I try to run a backfill rake it gives me an error:

rake ai:sentiment:backfill
rake aborted!
ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid: PG::SyntaxError: ERROR:  syntax error at or near ")" (ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid)
LINE 1: ...e_upload_id", "posts"."outbound_message_id" FROM () as posts...
                                                             ^
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/rack-mini-profiler-3.3.1/lib/patches/db/pg.rb:69:in `exec_params'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/rack-mini-profiler-3.3.1/lib/patches/db/pg.rb:69:in `exec_params'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/postgresql_adapter.rb:894:in `block (2 levels) in exec_no_cache'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract_adapter.rb:1004:in `block in with_raw_connection'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activesupport-7.2.2.1/lib/active_support/concurrency/null_lock.rb:9:in `synchronize'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract_adapter.rb:976:in `with_raw_connection'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/postgresql_adapter.rb:893:in `block in exec_no_cache'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activesupport-7.2.2.1/lib/active_support/notifications/instrumenter.rb:58:in `instrument'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract_adapter.rb:1119:in `log'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/postgresql_adapter.rb:892:in `exec_no_cache'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/postgresql_adapter.rb:872:in `execute_and_clear'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/postgresql/database_statements.rb:66:in `internal_exec_query'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/database_statements.rb:647:in `select'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/database_statements.rb:73:in `select_all'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/query_cache.rb:251:in `select_all'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/querying.rb:70:in `_query_by_sql'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:1431:in `block (2 levels) in exec_main_query'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/connection_pool.rb:415:in `with_connection'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_handling.rb:296:in `with_connection'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:1430:in `block in exec_main_query'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/query_cache.rb:143:in `disable_query_cache'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/query_cache.rb:30:in `uncached'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation/delegation.rb:78:in `block in uncached'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:1355:in `_scoping'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:541:in `scoping'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation/delegation.rb:78:in `uncached'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:1450:in `skip_query_cache_if_necessary'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:1414:in `exec_main_query'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:1392:in `block in exec_queries'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/query_cache.rb:143:in `disable_query_cache'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/query_cache.rb:30:in `uncached'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation/delegation.rb:120:in `public_send'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation/delegation.rb:120:in `block in method_missing'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:1355:in `_scoping'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:541:in `scoping'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation/delegation.rb:120:in `method_missing'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:1450:in `skip_query_cache_if_necessary'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:1386:in `exec_queries'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:1167:in `load'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:336:in `records'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation/batches.rb:380:in `block in batch_on_unloaded_relation'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation/batches.rb:378:in `batch_on_unloaded_relation'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation/batches.rb:269:in `in_batches'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation/batches.rb:157:in `find_in_batches'
/var/www/discourse/plugins/discourse-ai/lib/tasks/modules/sentiment/backfill.rake:7:in `block in <main>'
/usr/local/bin/bundle:25:in `load'
/usr/local/bin/bundle:25:in `<main>'

Caused by:
PG::SyntaxError: ERROR:  syntax error at or near ")" (PG::SyntaxError)
LINE 1: ...e_upload_id", "posts"."outbound_message_id" FROM () as posts...
                                                             ^
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/rack-mini-profiler-3.3.1/lib/patches/db/pg.rb:69:in `exec_params'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/rack-mini-profiler-3.3.1/lib/patches/db/pg.rb:69:in `exec_params'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/postgresql_adapter.rb:894:in `block (2 levels) in exec_no_cache'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract_adapter.rb:1004:in `block in with_raw_connection'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activesupport-7.2.2.1/lib/active_support/concurrency/null_lock.rb:9:in `synchronize'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract_adapter.rb:976:in `with_raw_connection'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/postgresql_adapter.rb:893:in `block in exec_no_cache'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activesupport-7.2.2.1/lib/active_support/notifications/instrumenter.rb:58:in `instrument'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract_adapter.rb:1119:in `log'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/postgresql_adapter.rb:892:in `exec_no_cache'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/postgresql_adapter.rb:872:in `execute_and_clear'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/postgresql/database_statements.rb:66:in `internal_exec_query'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/database_statements.rb:647:in `select'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/database_statements.rb:73:in `select_all'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/query_cache.rb:251:in `select_all'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/querying.rb:70:in `_query_by_sql'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:1431:in `block (2 levels) in exec_main_query'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/connection_pool.rb:415:in `with_connection'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_handling.rb:296:in `with_connection'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:1430:in `block in exec_main_query'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/query_cache.rb:143:in `disable_query_cache'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/query_cache.rb:30:in `uncached'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation/delegation.rb:78:in `block in uncached'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:1355:in `_scoping'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:541:in `scoping'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation/delegation.rb:78:in `uncached'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:1450:in `skip_query_cache_if_necessary'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:1414:in `exec_main_query'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:1392:in `block in exec_queries'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/query_cache.rb:143:in `disable_query_cache'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/query_cache.rb:30:in `uncached'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation/delegation.rb:120:in `public_send'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation/delegation.rb:120:in `block in method_missing'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:1355:in `_scoping'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:541:in `scoping'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation/delegation.rb:120:in `method_missing'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:1450:in `skip_query_cache_if_necessary'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:1386:in `exec_queries'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:1167:in `load'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:336:in `records'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation/batches.rb:380:in `block in batch_on_unloaded_relation'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation/batches.rb:378:in `batch_on_unloaded_relation'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation/batches.rb:269:in `in_batches'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.2.2.1/lib/active_record/relation/batches.rb:157:in `find_in_batches'
/var/www/discourse/plugins/discourse-ai/lib/tasks/modules/sentiment/backfill.rake:7:in `block in <main>'
/usr/local/bin/bundle:25:in `load'
/usr/local/bin/bundle:25:in `<main>'
Tasks: TOP => ai:sentiment:backfill
(See full trace by running task with --trace)

My question is, this was working fine until Nov/Dec 2024. How was it working earlier without a dedicated sentiment model/server? Is there a way to get it working again using a generic public service or built in service without having to run a dedicated server for it? I really like discourse is a self contained setup which makes it easy for simple deployment. Having to do custom deployments increases the complexity and maintenance costs which is troublesome for small deployments. Is there way to get back to the pre 2025 setup where sentiment worked out of the box?

The plugin defaulted to a server located in DigitalOcean which I put together to make testing easier.

I have since changed the plugin defaults to a clean slate and people who want AI classified need to run servers following the documentation here on Meta.

Indeed, but we were paying that cost for testing purposes. It’s not sustainable to offer that for every self hoster.

Worth mentioning, that we do offer this classification service on GPU accelerated servers as part of our hosting service.

2개의 좋아요

Discourse AI Sentiment Analysis Issues: Hugging Face Model Format & Azure Endpoint Failure


Hi Discourse Community and Developers,

I’m encountering significant issues when attempting to configure and use the Sentiment Analysis feature within the Discourse AI plugin on my forum. It appears there are two distinct problems preventing it from working correctly.


Issue 1: Hugging Face Model Response Format Mismatch

I’ve configured the cardiffnlp/twitter-roberta-base-sentiment model from Hugging Face for sentiment analysis. While my API key is valid and I can successfully call the API from my Discourse instance using curl, the Discourse AI plugin seems to be parsing the response incorrectly due to a change in the Hugging Face model’s output format.

My curl command (confirming valid API key and new format):

Bashcurl -X POST https://api-inference.huggingface.co/models/cardiffnlp/twitter-roberta-base-sentiment \ -H "Authorization: Bearer hf_xxxxxxxxxxx" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d "{\"inputs\": \"I love Discourse!\"}"

Output from curl (showing the new nested array format):

[[{"label":"LABEL_2","score":0.9891520738601685},{"label":"LABEL_1","score":0.009014752693474293},{"label":"LABEL_0","score":0.0018332178005948663}]]

Problem: The twitter-roberta-base-sentiment model used to return a single array of label-score hashes: [{"label": "LABEL_2", "score": 0.98}, ...]. However, it now returns a nested array: [[{"label": "LABEL_2", "score": 0.98}, ...]].

The Discourse AI plugin’s hardcoded parsing logic (specifically, classification["label"][/\d+/].to_i as indicated by the backtrace) does not account for this outer array layer. This leads to a TypeError when it tries to access a Symbol as an Integer.

Error Message (from Job Exception):

no implicit conversion of Symbol into Integer (TypeError)
/var/www/discourse/plugins/discourse-ai/lib/sentiment/post_classification.rb:163:in block in transform_result’
/var/www/discourse/plugins/discourse-ai/lib/sentiment/post_classification.rb:163:in each’
/var/www/discourse/plugin…`

Full Backtrace for Hugging Face Issue:

/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/concurrent-ruby-1.3.5/lib/concurrent-ruby/concurrent/promises.rb:1268:in `raise'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/concurrent-ruby-1.3.5/lib/concurrent-ruby/concurrent/promises.rb:1268:in `wait_until_resolved!'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/concurrent-ruby-1.3.5/lib/concurrent-ruby/concurrent/promises.rb:998:in `value!'
/var/www/discourse/plugins/discourse-ai/lib/sentiment/post_classification.rb:93:in `bulk_classify!'
/var/www/discourse/plugins/discourse-ai/app/jobs/scheduled/sentiment_backfill.rb:27:in `execute'
/var/www/discourse/app/jobs/base.rb:316:in `block (2 levels) in perform'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/rails_multisite-6.1.0/lib/rails_multisite/connection_management/null_instance.rb:49:in `with_connection'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/rails_multisite-6.1.0/lib/rails_multisite/connection_management.rb:21:in `with_connection'
/var/www/discourse/app/jobs/base.rb:303:in `block in perform'
/var/www/discourse/app/jobs/base.rb:299:in `each'
/var/www/discourse/app/jobs/base.rb:299:in `perform'
/var/www/discourse/app/jobs/base.rb:379:in `perform'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/mini_scheduler-0.18.0/lib/mini_scheduler/manager.rb:137:in `process_queue'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/mini_scheduler-0.18.0/lib/mini_scheduler/manager.rb:77:in `worker_loop'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/mini_scheduler-0.18.0/lib/mini_scheduler/manager.rb:63:in `block (2 levels) in ensure_worker_threads'
<internal:kernel>:187:in `loop'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/concurrent-ruby-1.3.5/lib/concurrent-ruby/concurrent/executor/ruby_thread_pool_executor.rb:341:in `block (2 levels) in create_worker'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/concurrent-ruby-1.3.5/lib/concurrent-ruby/concurrent/executor/ruby_thread_pool_executor.rb:340:in `catch'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/concurrent-ruby-1.3.5/lib/concurrent-ruby/concurrent/executor/ruby_thread_pool_executor.rb:340:in `block in create_worker'
no implicit conversion of Symbol into Integer (TypeError)
/var/www/discourse/plugins/discourse-ai/lib/sentiment/post_classification.rb:163:in `block in transform_result'
/var/www/discourse/plugins/discourse-ai/lib/sentiment/post_classification.rb:163:in `each'
/var/www/discourse/plugin...

Issue 2: Microsoft Azure Model Configuration Leads to Hugging Face Error

When I attempted to switch to the Microsoft Text Analytics model within the Discourse AI settings, I encountered a 404 Resource not found error, and surprisingly, the backtrace still points to hugging_face_text_embeddings.rb.

Error Message (from Job Exception):

Job exception: 416 errors
{"error":{"code":"404","message": "Resource not found"}} (Net::HTTPBadResponse)

Relevant Backtrace Snippet (pointing to Hugging Face despite Microsoft model selected):

/var/www/discourse/plugins/discourse-ai/lib/inference/hugging_face_text_embeddings.rb:76:in `do_request!'
/var/www/discourse/plugins/discourse-ai/lib/inference/hugging_face_text_embeddings.rb:51:in `classify_by_sentiment!'
/var/www/discourse/plugins/discourse-ai/lib/sentiment/post_classification.rb:156:in `request_with'

Observation: This indicates that even when I select and configure the Microsoft model’s endpoint and API key, the Discourse AI plugin appears to be hardcoded or incorrectly routing the sentiment analysis requests through Hugging Face-specific logic or endpoints. This prevents the Microsoft model from being used at all.


Configuration Screenshots:

I’ve attached screenshot of my Discourse AI settings to show the configuration:

  • Detailed configuration for AI sentiment models (showing both Hugging Face and Microsoft models) - I tested with just Hugging Face or just Microsoft model configs with the same result

These issues make the sentiment analysis feature effectively unusable. It seems the plugin requires an update to handle the new Hugging Face response format and to correctly route requests when different sentiment providers are configured.

Any assistance or guidance on these issues would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you!

2개의 좋아요

I am curious if sentiment reporting is functioning for others, or if I have misconfigured something. I would like to know what else I need to check or configure to enable sentiment reporting, as I am still experiencing the same issue.

1개의 좋아요

We are trying to use this feature with Azure AI Language (from our self-hosted Discourse instance) - as we are already using our Azure subscription to integrate GPT-4.5 with Discourse (for summarization and chat-bot functionality):

…but we are getting no data in the the sentiment dashboard, and can see these errors in the logs:

Discourse AI: Errors during bulk classification: Failed to classify 208 posts (example ids: 2256, 909, 2270, 2260, 2797) : JSON::ParserError : An empty string is not a valid JSON string.

The backtrace shows that Discourse might be trying to use HuggingFace - are these the only models supported at the moment?

Thanks,

N

1개의 좋아요

So, is the only way to use this feature to setup your own instances of the models (which need resource heavy GPU instances that would be costly)? This feature looks very useful, but it seems like it would cost me more to set up than my actual Discourse hosting.

Yes, the supported models are the ones listed in the OP.

We will eventually add support for classifying using LLMs for people whose cost isn’t an issue.

Well, the whole feature is build around classifying posts using ML models, so yes, you need somewhere to run those.

And since Discourse can run in the very cheapest VPS out there, running ML models is indeed more expensive. If you wanna have the feature on the cheapest way possible, it is doable to run it on a server with just a handful of CPU cores, as long as you have enough RAM to load the models.

1개의 좋아요

Sorry if this question has already been asked before, but I was unable to find a reference to where exactly the threshold score can be configured :sweat_smile:

1개의 좋아요

Unfortunately, the threshold score is not something that is configurable by users or admins. It’s a specific value set in the code base.

1개의 좋아요