The new Terms of Service have been merged: https://github.com/discourse/discourse/commit/15e793fd3b6c280e1539ad019b942c212ee0e0ae
That link doesn’t show the ToS themselves? Where are they? And is there a changelog / diff for the new Terms?
The diff is there, it’s just long so GitHub hides it by default. Click “Load Diff” on
config/locales/server.en.yml to see the changes. Be aware, this wasn’t simply an edit of the existing template, but a from-scratch rewrite. The diff isn’t likely that helpful. You may be better off reading it at https://github.com/discourse/discourse/blob/master/config/locales/server.en.yml#L3469.
@wolftune, as a practical matter, the terms have been entirely rewritten.
Right, so the question for everyone who already has adjusted or rewritten terms for existing forums: is there any summary / changelog / discussion available about the key concerns that the rewrite addresses?
Put another way: we weren’t satisfied with the original (and dated) Discourse ToS based on Wordpress. We went and combined relevant bits into a larger ToS we adapted from GitHub. Now, I want to read the new Discourse terms and have some idea in advance about whether there are particular parts to consider pulling into our terms now (or not).
Also, anyone have the updated terms in place where I can read them rendered rather than raw html?
There is not.
It’s entirely up to forum hosts what terms of service, privacy policies, and other documents they publish and follow. We’re happy to share the terms that we use as part of the standard install, and to make filling them in simple, using the wizard. But we can’t take attorney-like responsibility for every Discourse host’s decisions, or provide legal advice like commentary or opinions on what we provide.
I wasn’t referencing any attorney-like responsibility or legal advice. Just describing a summary of key points or the process you did for the rewrite isn’t legal advice for anyone.
I was asking more like https://keepachangelog.com style summary that might be more pointed than just “rewrite from scratch”. It doesn’t need to be more than that, but it would be ideal.
But anyway, I got my answer that there’s no such summary.
Hmm, the use of binding arbitration AND class action waiver in the defaults is slightly concerning:
Other than to seek an injunction or for claims under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, you and the company will resolve any Dispute by binding American Arbitration Association arbitration. Arbitration will follow the AAA’s Commercial Arbitration Rules and Supplementary Procedures for Consumer Related Disputes. Arbitration will happen in San Francisco, California. You will settle any dispute as an individual, and not as part of a class action or other representative proceeding, whether as the plaintiff or a class member. No arbitrator will consolidate any dispute with any other arbitration without the company’s permission.
Aside from the well-known problems with these: Arbitration is really, really expensive for the “company” - sometimes more expensive than the local legal system - and for hobby forums this is not going to be the best terms for them.
CDCK, Inc. can’t make any guarantee that the template terms that ship with Discourse will be the best terms for any particular forum operator. We’re happy to offer a starting point. Forum operators can and should make changes to suit their needs from there, or replace the template entirely.
Anything that we’re expecting every/most forum operator to change should be in the setup wizard, then
Sort of, this was in the original Discourse 1.0 design spec but we quickly realized almost nobody actually cares about customizing the terms of service. Whether they should or not is a different discussion, but the reality is… well, the reality.
Arbitration is not necessarily more expensive or worse than the local legal system. It really depends. I haven’t reviewed the AAA’s Supplementary Procedures for Consumer Related Disputes, but I suspect it was chosen as it suited to the forum - user context.
I wonder whether it’s worth generating a list of choice of law clauses (i.e. what laws and what dispute resolution procedure applies) which would be automatically inserted based on the locale of the site. Maybe something to add to the legal tools plugin.
A little pity that user content is not automatically CC licensed anymore with the new TOS. I actually did like the old behavior, the alternative now is to include CC-license notes in each (bigger) message?
Well, you can obviously just add a clause about CC licensing to your forum’s ToS.
I was wondering if there was a particular reason jurisdiction was set to San Francisco? Are the courts there particularly well-versed in tech related issues? Some other reason to consider? Compared with say Delaware where many companies are incorporated.
If anyone knows I’d be curious to learn why…
San Francisco was picked for its geographic convenience. No one on the team is in Delaware (for example), so we wouldn’t want to need to fly there if we ended up in court.
city for disputes is intended to be selected by the site admin/owner, you are under no obligation to use San Francisco like we do. You should discuss with your legal counsel as to what location makes sense for you.
Of course. I would normally put NY or somewhere convenient. This is my first “tech” ToS that is not a normal commercial contract. I thought maybe SF had some secret Silicon Valley courts. Guess not
If Discourse.org is relying on a third party - like Google or Amazon - which of course you would be - are your terms with Google / Amazon reflected in the terms you’ve signed with your customers?
Apologies if I missed this. I’ve had a look through the forum but didn’t see it.
Thanks, it was the hosting terms I couldn’t find. This is very helpful!