One issue here is that even admins should not be able to enter certain groups. I know, this is impossible, but it clearly shows the limits of online as opposed to offline.
2 Me gusta
That sounds like that would dangerous. If something gets out of hand, who’s to put a stop to it or at least force them to calm down. And if it’s just person, would you want that person to continue causing trouble for the rest of the group?
The administrator is responsible for the entire community and therefore should have access to everything, groups included.
2 Me gusta
That is probably true if the discussion is about games, and if the users are anyone who has an opinion.
But for an invite-only Discourse among members of a political party, the more important aspect is that they can develop ideas and positions before they share those with everyone else.
This goes back to my point that online does not (yet) reflect offline. Offline, we all seek out quiet places where we can talk with another person in private. But online this does not seem to be a concept at all. Or this is only possible on Signal, Telegram, Threema.
3 Me gusta
Hay un plugin para Discourse llamado Discourse Encrypt (deprecated) que permite a las personas cifrar sus mensajes personales. Por lo tanto, me imagino que, si bien puede que no sea posible crear grupos o categorías donde un administrador no tenga acceso, creo que las personas pueden crear mensajes personales grupales que estén cifrados, evitando así que los administradores vean el contenido del mensaje grupal.
Quizás esa solución le funcione.
6 Me gusta
Para mí, siempre está instalando plugins. Sé que no es difícil, pero esa cosa de reconstruir el lanzador siempre pone a prueba mi paciencia, especialmente porque mi consola de DigitalOcean siempre se desconecta. Sinceramente, creo que ningún otro foro se acerca a lo que puedes hacer con Discourse. 
2 Me gusta
No uses esa consola. Es principalmente solo para cosas de rescate.
4 Me gusta