Why there is huge difference in Pageviews tracking number on discourse admin dahboard and on google analytics

Anyone else seeing big discrepancies between Google Analytics “page views” and API Calls on the dashboard these days? Particularly on our hosting or self hosting?

Digital Ocean hosting, tests-passed

9,789 Api Requests in last 7 days
(1,466 crawlers, 4,891 Logged in, 3,432 Anon)

6,532 Pageviews

Not orders of magnitude like the OP, but still a 50% increase from the google figure. The proportions hold up historically - google consistently reports ~1.5x as many page views as API calls.

We are seeing very big differences here:

The ‘pageviews’ according to Discourse are 65K, but according to GA they are only 13K.

So something is not right here.

I am working on reconciling this at the moment and am adding more internal diagnostics.

In particular I will ensure we set a header on every response that generates a page view.

Off the bat a big discrepancy is that analytics does not count web crawlers or anything that does not run JavaScript

Same here. For one day I had:

Google Analytics //

  • 163 Sessions
  • 61 Users (Logged and Anonymous)
  • 1 863 pages views

Meanwhile the dashboard report:

  • 4 800 Pages Views

16 from webcrawler an bots
2 500 from logged users
2 300 from anonymous

2.5x times more. That will put me in the 140k PV per month and the site is not launched yet. I am quite worry I will bust the 650k by far.

Since my original message I have reconciled multiple sites multiple times.

We simply count differently to what google does.

Google uses JavaScript ajax calls to count page views. We work hard only to issue them on first load or when you transition routes (like move from topics to latest list)

Our Page View counting is performed on the “raw requests” made (accounting for a header that informs us when to count)

Bots, JavaScript disabled are counted by us but omitted from Google.

It is worth mentioning that we added better bot user agent reporting plus user agent blacklist and whitelist support in 2.0 to deal with badly behaved bots of which there are .. many.

Has something changed recently? My Google analytics are showing a big drop in traffic but my Discourse stats do not reflect the same kind of drop?

We more aggressively throttle bots and crawlers in Discourse 2.0, particularly Bing which was pathologically bad. You can search if you are curious.

I am seeing the exact same thing…

May 2018

June 2018

July 2018

Hi @codinghorror, The thing is, my discourse stats have remained more or less consistent, it is my Google analytics which have dropped - at pretty much the same time as I added the advertising code. Wondering whether it is possible my ad code is interfering with the Google Analytics somehow.

@jerdog did you add any new plugins or code to the site? Seem to have recovered in your last screengrab?

The only plugin I added in that span of time is the GitHub - discourse/discourse-github-linkback: DEPRECATED: Links github content back to a Discourse forum · GitHub

It has begun to normalise again starting a few days ago which makes me wonder what happened to the codebase that might have contributed between June and late Sept?

Does anyone else see the same thing?

To me it looks like you had some sort of bug going where zero traffic was reported to analytics. I know we recently reorganised how we do analytics so it is very possible you still have the bug going but our new design works around your bug.

Hmm - ok I’m not seeing that across the rest of our properties so it’s a bit strange.

Not having checked my analytics for a while, it seems the issue is fixed since early August, so possibly fixed by the change you suggested above! nice one! :grinning:

Parece que Discourse está informando una visualización de página a GA solo en la primera carga de la página, pero está rastreando internamente una visualización de página cada vez que se carga una nueva página de contenido de forma inline.

Parecería más apropiado que Discourse informe una visualización de página a GA cada vez que se actualice la URL.

Por ejemplo: carga una discusión, la URL es /t/topic/1000, baja hasta el final y la siguiente página de publicaciones se carga, la URL se actualiza a /t/topic/1000/20, y debería registrarse una nueva visualización de página en GA con esa URL.

¿Te refieres a la primera página de un tema (los primeros 20 mensajes)? Sí, así funciona.

Sí, parece que Discourse está rastreando las visualizaciones de página de manera interna diferente a lo que reporta a GA, por lo que los números de GA parecen ser consistentemente más bajos.

Sería genial solucionarlo para enviar una nueva visualización de página a GA cada vez que cambie la URL.

No, esa no es la razón por la que los números son diferentes. Esta es la razón:

Hoy en día, la mitad de las personas navegan con Adblock bloqueando Analytics, y los números internos de Discourse pueden contar esas visitas.

Eso sería extraño. Actualizamos la URL para cada publicación; ¿crees que leer este tema justifica 40 visitas a la página?

Tienes razón, actualizar en cada publicación sería demasiado. Sin embargo, cargar la siguiente página de publicaciones debería contar como una nueva visita. (Y usar la URL que está en la barra de direcciones es lo más natural para esto.) De lo contrario, terminamos con números de visitas en GA mucho más bajos de lo que realmente representan la actividad del foro.