tntbombom proposed changing the Discourse link structure, replacing /t/ with the category name and removing or modifying /c/, to make URLs more understandable and visually appealing. purldator assumed this was for SEO purposes, but tntbombom clarified it was for usability and aesthetics. Mittineague pointed out that while a solution is theoretically possible, it would require significant coding effort and is not currently a priority since the existing routing system is functional.
hi there , i can see great links nomenclature in discourse.
examples:-
(1):- Support - Discourse Meta
instead of putting /c/ it just directly go to /support , or even modifying /c/ to /category/ or ..etc.
(2):- https://meta.discourse.org/t/xyxyxyxyx/0000000
instead of /t/ we put the category name /bug/ or /..etc/
so hope i can these features available or any guides for it if already they r .
thnx
Please tell me if I am incorrect with my assumption. It sounds like you want to change the structure of the URL for SEO purposes.
If not, apologies for the assumption. But either way, the topic of changing the url structure has been discussed before here:
If you have the advanced skill level to edit Discourse’s source code, then Sam’s answer may be what you seek:
no not for SEO purposes. but yeah i c , then there is no solutions on the horizon atm.
is just to make the URL more understandably useable and give some prettiness to it.
in both cases thnx for your help. 
The solution is there. Just that it would take quite a lot to alter the current routing code.
As this would be for “looks” and routing as it is now isn’t broken, the “cost” isn’t worth the “benefit”.
Not to say it couldn’t be done if the skill and interest (or monetary incentive) were there.