I don’t know at all how GPT (directly or thru API) works. System prompts are really hard for me, and using english creative way doesn’t make it any easier. Because of those and a couple other things I haven’t too realistic expectations what GPT can do. So I am like GPT in this matter: no knowlidge, reading easy access copy&paste articles where I don’t know at all if facts are even remotely trustful and blanks I’m filling using halkucination. But I have a lot, and I mean really lot tests and tries burning way too much money.
Is that enough about disclaimer?
I claim GPT has longer memory than it should. Or I put it that way: it depends of, I don’t know, like how much users OpenAI has. Or how close using cap one is. But defenetly fresh gpt-4 remembers way longer than it should. Gpt-3.5 line not that much and I claim that 3.5 models has lobotimised receltly favour of 4.
And you guys will take step fpteard and say I should leave grownups alone and have theirs conversation because you aren’t using GPT by OpenAI ![:rofl: :rofl:](https://emoji.discourse-cdn.com/twitter/rofl.png?v=12)
But everytime I make iterations changing prompt a bit and starting new conversations I got same’ish results: first close or totally what I wanted, and then it started fail me.
Then I started to do a bit different things and I managed get answers that weren’t possible unless GPT have longer memory. Sure, there is strong possibility I actually feed false memories to it, or I wasn’t as smart as I thought (again, english is difficult to me) and it was just lucky guess or coincident, aka. what GPT does.
So what you guys call degration is actually kind of frustration. Stupid human is asking same question again and again and smart world dominating intelligence try give a bit different answe try after try. So, in the end it has zero interesting topics from here left, because it offered those all thru iteration rounds.
Your Bert is just really pissed off because nothing it offers to you isn’t good enough and finally it just say screw you guys, I’m going home — well, it is pollite guy so he doesn’t use exactly those wording, but the tone is same.
TLDR; iterations can waste possibilities because there is not endless amount of new and interesting topics (no matter if devs say it is not possible; those guys can’t read humans, so I’m not totally sure if they undestand AI any better
)