Not sure if reply here or new post is warranted: Feature request - separate schedules for ‘include attachments’ versus ‘don’t include attachments’.
Would really love daily small backups, possibly even multiple times per day since that database is small. Attachments I wouldn’t be devastated to lose a week’s worth since they’re much more limited and typically people can find their source again. This could increase the safety factor without overwhelming the storage.
I haven’t looked at the source but it would probably be a bit of an overhaul since the restores would have to be separate entities, or at least the ability to have different restore points for the 2 sources.
Fairly reasonable. As soon as I start considering external tools I think of ‘external ways to really mess things up’ since they’re typically capable of more havoc than the built in idiot-proof(ish) admin console.
If you want lots of backups with WordPress (a popular web platform) you need to use a backup plugin that costs money, so maybe not every other app does that natively. At least that’s what I’m doing, though it was a long time ago that I made that decision, so maybe it was a bad one.
The reason is that having lots of backups is a way to fill up your disk, which is on of the most common reasons that a self-hosted site goes down (which I think puts it in the “expensive” category). So the idea is that if you have enough skills to manage a zlillion backups and manage your disk space then you can probably work this out any of a bunch of ways. And if you want hourly backups, then you need to have those be database-only backups rather than dozens or hundreds of copies of your uploads.
So hourly backups make sense only if you have uploads on S3 so that you could then do database-only backups, and probably push those to S3 so you’re not worried about your local disk. And then that’s a pretty small number of self-hosted sites that want that.
If yo have all of that in place, then a plugin that would do hourly database-only backups wouldn’t be more than an hour or two of work, or maybe 2-10 if you don’t know how to make a plugin and have to figure out how to make an hourly job.
Then it is mostly small in size, but it is the biggest if we think forum itself. But for some reason we are back to this:
I really would like to hear is the main issue here technically or mentally. Or is this actually part of business model and if backuping will be easy and working, hosting will loose one pitch — and I don’t know if there is such sales pitcihing at all. I’m just trying to uderstand why better backuping is so major question, even it is requested before.
There is no need to suspect that there is a strategy or evil plan behind this. I don’t think there is much interest for more frequent backups. If there was, someone would have written a plugin for it. That would be a few hours of work. I don’t see #marketplace flooded with requests for it.
I think it boils down to:
for small forums, you won’t lose much data anyway because there is not much new in a day, so more frequent backups are not really worth the effort
for larger forums, more frequent backups will take performance and storage
for really large forums, you want to look at different solutions (like replication to a hot standby database server)
Don’t forget that the odds of actually needing a backup are really small as well. In the history of Communiteq (over 8 years), we only needed to restore a backup once* and that was only because we were impatient and did not want to wait a few hours for a file system recovery.
*) (excluding restores on request of the client where they just wanted to roll back changes, mostly in non-production forums, and excluding our monthly restore test)
I’m thinking $250-500, depending on how configurable it is and how much work is needed on the front end. I haven’t actually looked at what it would take, though. @RGJ might do it for less; he’s often surprised me with how quickly he can do things.
EDIT: OH, this topic is closed. If you’re interested, you can contact me or post in #marketplace .