Thanks for the response. Yes, I can give you some more info and explain why weād find this useful.
Our site is a social network for gay men that has existed for over 20 years. It has the usual social network features (such as profiles, a messaging system etc), and one section of the site is a forum. We moved that forum section over to run on Discourse five years ago, so our Discourse instance is linked to the rest of the site but is only one small section of the site. And it is only accessible to logged-in members.
(ETA: The profiles and messaging system mentioned are not those in Discourse. They are our own software.)
As with most freemium offerings, paying supporters get extra features (such as being able to see who has viewed their profile) and expanded limits (such as a larger messaging inbox).
At the moment, everyone gets equal access to the forum, whether theyāre a paying supporter or a free member, but it would be great to be able to differentiate. That way, as part of our list of extra supporter benefits we could include āUnlimited forum posting!ā or something along those lines.
Obviously, I get the point youāre making about hamstringing people, and I understand that normally a forum community is going to want all the engagement it can get. We get plenty of engagement
so Iād be happy for it to be limited for our free members and unlimited for supporters.
This doesnāt have to be linked to trust levels. In fact, it would be even better if we could create custom groups that we assign to members (depending on their supporter/non-supporter status, in our case) and then have the ability to set limits for those groups.
Itās already possible to set max topics per day, max edits per day and so on, and itās possible to set limits for new users (including max replies in first day). Beyond that, thereās currently no facility to set differentiated limits (such as to the number of posts per day) according to trust level or custom group.