It’s a bit like the fortune cookie game, where you add the same phrase (e.g., “in jail”) after reading every fortune. My reading of the flag actions is…
agreewith flag
disagreewith flag
ignoreflag
deleteflag??? – I don’t intuitively jump to “post” here.
My belief is that additional clarity–and fewer assumptions needed on the part of the user–can only be helpful.
The ... is the indication. Any button with ... will not take immediate action, but open a dropdown (or modal) where you then take action.
Interesting idea. On my long-term todo list is another topic which goes more in-depth into the review queue, if we add a link it should likely be to that once created.
We could definitely make better use of title attributes here, no question. At the moment, title for Agree... and Delete... simply repeat the text on the button, and there’s no title attribute or disagree or ignore.
I can see the confusion here. We in essence have “Agree with flag and …”, “Disagree with flag”, “Ignore flag”, and “Delete post and …”. That’s clearly not consistent.
As @ondrej mentioned, you can edit the button text for your site, but we’ll look into improving this globally.
Also, just to check, queue posts and queued users don’t cause any confusion for your staff, right? Those reviewables are a bit clearer:
As punctuation, it’s easily glossed over. Usually an indication of “More options” on a button is a stemless arrow, or if it is the ellipsis, styled differently to help indicate “something is here!”
Approve/Delete User seems clear to me (though I don’t recognize that screen / don’t think we have a queued users setting turned on on our forum. I am just a volunteer moderator, not part of the admin/staff). For the queued posts, yep, specifying “Delete User” is helpful there to distinguish from the other options.