The prompt is a button, āSummarize with AIā, unless Iām missing the obvious here? Also, this is a fantastic plug-in, canāt wait to explore.
The prompts are all shown in the post precisely one back from your first
Rookie error. This is what I get for moving too fast ā¦ Iāll give it a whirl and report back.
Make sure you are using my plugin. It was the first to summarise with AI but is not the official plugin.
Bug: Selecting gpt-4-turbo
results in a 500 error when a post is being made.
That might be because of a wrong setup or permissions but a 500 error on every post creation might be a bit harsh.
Faraday::BadRequestError (the server responded with status 400)
faraday (2.9.0) lib/faraday/response/raise_error.rb:16:in `on_complete'
faraday (2.9.0) lib/faraday/middleware.rb:18:in `block in call'
faraday (2.9.0) lib/faraday/response.rb:42:in `on_complete'
faraday (2.9.0) lib/faraday/middleware.rb:17:in `call'
faraday (2.9.0) lib/faraday/rack_builder.rb:152:in `build_response'
faraday (2.9.0) lib/faraday/connection.rb:444:in `run_request'
faraday (2.9.0) lib/faraday/connection.rb:280:in `post'
ruby-openai (7.0.0) lib/openai/http.rb:22:in `json_post'
ruby-openai (7.0.0) lib/openai/client.rb:30:in `chat'
plugins/discourse-ai-topic-summary/lib/ai_topic_summary/call_bot.rb:15:in `get_response'
plugins/discourse-ai-topic-summary/lib/ai_topic_summary/summarise.rb:6:in `retrieve_summary'
plugins/discourse-ai-topic-summary/plugin.rb:62:in `block (2 levels) in activate!'
lib/discourse_event.rb:12:in `block in trigger'
Yep, true.
It should also probably spawn a job rather than do the work inline, just like Chatbot.
Probably should log the detail response if at all possible too.
Does it work with gpt-3.5-turbo
?
If so, very likely this is a permissions issue where the admin does not have access to GPT 4 turbo for some reason, but agree it should not result in a failure to post, perhaps just do no summary update and log an error.
Yes, itās a permissions issue for sure.
Is tagging based on the summary thatās generated? For example, Iād prefer no summary but have tagging function. And if thatās the case, maybe hide it?
Lastly (see screenshot), this thing is ripe for abuse. At the moment it appears even non-logged in users can downvote.
Correct.
Sure you could do that with CSS, or might get away with this settting:
ai topic summary rely on sidebar widget instead
and just not use the widget.
No it isnāt?
Anonymous users are not presented with this interface, nor are they allowed to vote.
but thanks for the reputation bomb
This plugin is over a year old - I think the community would have caught that one
As with Chatbot, you can now use the latest Open AI model with this plugin:
gpt-4o