Améliorations de la recherche dans 2.3

For the upcoming 2.3 release, we’ve added a new feature and made several fixes to the way we index posts for search that will make search results better.

1. Search Priorities for Categories


Each individual category can be configured with a search priority which you can find under the Settings tab when creating/editing a category. Five levels for prioritization have been added: ignore, very low, low, high and very high. The levels work by multiplying a pre-configured weight to the search ranking for each result and can be configured via hidden site settings in your console.

As an example, configuring a category’s search priority to very_high will boost its search ranking by 40% while a search priority of very_low will reduce its search ranking by 40%. Setting a category’s search priority to ignore will remove it from the search results. However, you can still search for posts within the ignored category by scoping the search to the category via advanced search. Do take note that search priority is not inherited which means that a sub-category will still be searchable even if the parent category has been configured to be ignored.

2. Improvements and Fixes to Search Results

  1. Search relevance has been updated to consider the document length in the ranking. Previously, search ranking was ranked by the most number of matches for the given search term. This was problematic for search results as we noticed that longer posts were more likely to be ranked higher because of the tendency to produce a higher number of matches. As a result, we’ve made the switch to consider the document length when ranking search results.
    FIX: Relevance search will now consider document length in ranking. · discourse/discourse@e87ca59 · GitHub

  2. Improve the quality of the raw data that we use to generate the search index. PERF: Improve quality of `PostSearchData#raw_data`. (#7275) · discourse/discourse@cfd5078 · GitHub

    • URLs in posts were sometimes incorrectly tokenized and indexed twice leading to terms within links having a higher ranking.
    • Content for lightboxes in posts were polluting search results with the image’s metadata.
  3. Empty posts such as moderator actions or small post actions (closing, assigning) are no longer part of the search index. This change leads to a smaller index and less noise in search results. FIX: Don't index posts with empty `Post#raw` for search. (#7263) · discourse/discourse@daeda80 · GitHub

  4. Smaller search index by deleting posts of trashed topics from the index. PERF: Delete search data of posts from trashed topics periodically. (… · discourse/discourse@d151425 · GitHub

  5. When a post is moved to a different topic, the search data for the post was not updated and would lead to the post incorrectly appearing in searches that matched the category of the old topic. FIX: Reindex post for search when post is moved to a different topic. · discourse/discourse@d808f36 · GitHub

  6. Smaller payload for search results by excluding the cooked version of the posts. PERF: Reduce number of queries and size of payload when searching. · discourse/discourse@03c6b22 · GitHub

  7. The blurb for posts in search results was broken when searching for an exact phrase and lead to missing search term highlights on the client side. FIX: Post blurb incorrect when search contains a phrase match. · discourse/discourse@dae0bb4 · GitHub

Do let us know if you’re search results have improved after these changes. We would also like to know if you think your search results have become worse so that we can continue to refine it. Thank you all!

43 « J'aime »

Is the age of a post part of the weight in ranking search results? Information gets stale fairly quickly in our forum, so it would be nice to have a way to reduce the relevance of older postings without actually eliminating them.

11 « J'aime »

Not yet, but it is an interesting idea, even in the weaker form of simply factoring in the date the topic was last touched

7 « J'aime »

J’adorerais voir un moyen d’épingler des sujets dans les résultats de recherche pour qu’ils apparaissent en premier. Ainsi, les recherches courantes pourraient être orientées directement vers nos tutoriels.

Vous pouvez le faire en modifiant la priorité de recherche pour la catégorie dans laquelle se trouvent ces sujets.

Mon « problème » est que ces sujets sont répartis dans toutes les catégories du forum selon un contexte donné. Par conséquent, je ne peux pas utiliser l’approche basée sur les catégories.

Alors vous êtes coincé car il n’existe pas de méthode aléatoire par sujet pour faire cela, et il n’y en aura jamais.

Peut-être que les priorités de recherche pour les balises pourraient être une fonctionnalité à l’avenir ? Bien que ce ne soit pas aussi simple, car les sujets peuvent avoir plusieurs balises…

La possibilité de pondérer les catégories est d’ailleurs une excellente fonctionnalité ! J’ai déjà plusieurs catégories spéciales peu pertinentes sur mon forum qu’il sera agréable de repousser un peu dans les résultats de recherche.

6 « J'aime »

Oui, je vois cela arriver à un moment donné.

10 « J'aime »

Ce serait génial ! Ainsi, les articles de blog pourraient être étiquetés comme tels et priorisés dans les recherches…

1 « J'aime »

J’aimerais beaucoup voir une façon pour que certains tags influencent également la priorité de recherche.

4 « J'aime »

Y a-t-il un projet d’ajouter cela à la version 2.4.X ? Ou à la 2.5 ?

Est-ce une chose maintenant ?

Je ne suis pas assez calée pour déchiffrer cette ressource : Search Controller Need help with understanding how discourse search works - #3 by neounix

2 « J'aime »

Pas encore. Pour le moment, seules les catégories ont une priorisation de recherche configurable.

3 « J'aime »