Обновление структуры категорий на Meta

Something like… Category Groups - Theme component? It wouldn’t be hard to come up with category groups to contain everything, though we’d lose the rollup functions of a parent category with subcats.

I’m not having trouble with that, but it’s probably not super intuitive. If the default setup had parent categories in the sidebar list, then setting them all to “Show subcategory list above topics in this category” / “Boxes”, a la Documentation, could be nice:

(Apologies if I’m duplicating suggestions – there’s a lot to scan in this topic.)

3 лайка

Don’t worry about it. We’re all just riffing here…

Yeah, @bryce shared some similar feedback with me elsewhere. I’m gonna see what we can do along these lines.

I had framed things as two options earlier:

But Bryce suggested there may still be another option – to more clearly distinguish which type are which – so I’m going to try that first.

Hang tight…

2 лайка

OK, I’m made some progress today on these things:

  • restricting posting in top level categories that are meant to mainly be containers for subcategories
  • added descriptions for new categories so their banners show up
  • configured top level categories to show their subcategories, to make them easier to discover

I still need to work on this:

Will circle back to that problem soon.

3 лайка

This really improves things for me.

I think there is a glitch in the description for the Customization category. When I follow « learn more » in the category description I end up in crash course for discourse themes :woozy_face:


2 лайка

I understand the advantages of having the subcategories at the top. At the same time, however, when I visit a category now, I no longer see any topics, only static content. I usually visit a category to find and read topics, not the name and description of the subcategories.

3 лайка

Are you just referring to what’s seen “above the fold”, or are you not getting the normal topic list below that?

1 лайк

There is a topic list below, but what I shared above is what I see without scrolling. Vertical space on a tablet is limited.

2 лайка

I think that was already in the category banner for the old #theme or #theme-component category.

Have oneboxed links to a category always had this nice format? Maybe I didn’t notice until they got descriptions and subcategories…


Reference screenshot. The real thing has live links to everything.

Very minor observation: long inline links to subcategories don’t flow quite as naturally in a sentence…

image

3 лайка

I made a couple small changes here, that I think help:

  • I moved General back out of this category, as an additional top level category
  • I reordered categories a bit so Community Building is second (1st after News and Events).
  • I made the category description a bit more concise
  • I did not add “show subcategories” for this category
    (It’s also not shown for Support)
    The decision about whether or not to show subcategories is dependent upon whether posting is allowed (or encouraged) at that top level
  • I did not move out the other three subcategories (data and reporting, praise, comparison).
    At the moment, these still feel like the best place for these to me.

So there are now 3 main, top-level discussion categories:

  • Community Building
  • General
  • Support

The other top level categories are more “category group”-like – primarily containers for subcategories.

I want to continue shaping this Community Building category. I’m wondering whether there are ways to provide greater affordances for more of these kinds of discussions for example:

  • Helping community managers new to Discourse learn their way around the product
  • Helping site admins new to community management learn their way around the practice
  • Sharing stories/experiences

But maybe that is something to focus on more separately after some of this other stuff settles down a bit more.

4 лайка

I feel like General is not a really helpful category on Meta. It holds 200 something topics right now, but looking through them many would actually fit right into Site Feedback, Feature or Support.

I think cleaning up the category would only leave maybe around 50 topics that indeed don’t belong anywhere else. And for these topics a more specific category title could make better sense (like Off-topic, Random Talk, Watercooler, …), rather than General.

2 лайка
Here is my categories tab

I didn’t use it yet really, but I already see a couple of issues:

  1. Wiki is OK because it shows all the subwikis.
  2. BUT Subwiki “index” links go to a category instead of the index topic (at least in the case of “Developer wiki”) which requires another click to access the one-shot resources where you can Ctrl+f.
  3. For some reason, the ¨Forum summaries" description is not showing in the News and Events page
  4. I choose to put News and Events > Announcements in my categories tab, but might as well revert to the default News and Events instead, since I’m interested in News and Events > Blog as well
  5. Community Building > Data & reporting definitely looks in the wrong place for me.
  6. Support does not show subcategories, which is detrimental when you try to get help on something specific
  7. For me “Data Reporting” belongs to Customization
  8. In Documentation, the index link is not readily available for Documentation > Site Management and Documentation > Developer Guides. You should use shorter descriptions such as the one for Documentation > Contributing so that the index link is clickable right away. Then be more verbose in the rest of the category description.
  9. The index links in documentation should point to the index topic, not the category (saves a click)
  10. In my categories tab I put all wikis, but I should customize and point to the wiki index topics instead to save a click.
  11. Is Dev a top category or should it be a subcategory of support? Then “solid dev knowledge” should be docs… Not sure here, but it seems a lot of Dev topics are support for developers. I would suggest moving Dev under support, muting it by default, and making a dedicated developer group unmuting that category.
2 лайка

Thanks for all the feedback @hellekin – some comments on each below:

Ah, interesting. The links are correct, but the boxes don’t let you click them. A click anywhere on the box is captured by the box itself, even though the link looks clickable:

This is a good suggestion, but I think it won’t help until we fix that first issue, otherwise these links aren’t clickable anyway.

Hmm… “works for me”:

Can you share a screenshot of what you’re seeing here?

:memo: noted. I still need to open a new topic about Community Building as earlier promised. I was away last week and will be away part of this week as well, so I may wait til next week to do that though.

I don’t think that’s the right spot for it, but let’s dive into it more in that forthcoming topic.

I decided (tentatively) not to show subcategories at the top within parent categories that allow posting in the top level.

The way we address this issue may depend on the direction we go with the next iteration of the theme (cc @manuel)

I moved this one around a few times as I was exploring. First, I had it in Contribute. Then, I put it in Customization. Finally, I decided it needed to be a top level category.

Thinking about the likely participants in each of these different categories, I think this belongs on its own.

That’s just how the default category boxes work right now. We could probably change the default behavior. Though I wonder what’s the intended experience in our documentation categories. It seems the index was added with the category banner in mind, rather than the category box:

At the same time the index topic stays pinned to the top of the topic list, it doesn’t automatically un-pin when the index topic is read. So we’re duplicating this index quite a bit: In the first place it’s meant to generate the sidebar menu. Then we pin it to the top of the topic list. Then we add a link to it to the visible category description.

I think we could actually drop the link from the description in the documentation categories.

1 лайк

Hmm… that’s not my experience.

But yeah, if it was working for me that way, then I think I’d see less of a need for the index to appear in these descriptions.

Regardless, this makes it clear the link is a workaround for a usability gap with our new docs plugin.

1 лайк

That’s strange. I went into several categories and the topic stayed pinned on all. Can we debug this?

1 лайк

I was about to ask how your preference for automatically unpinning topics is configured? I remember the default for Meta being changed a while back

But it seems Automatically unpin topics is disabled here now; at least, I cannot find the option in my preferences anymore.

3 лайка

Yes, there’s also two settings. I think Automatically unpin topics refers to any manually pinned topic. And Default topics automatic unpin only refers to topics that the system pins by default, like the welcome topic and “About this category” topics.

Do we actually need to distinguish the two? And if so, should we improve the descriptions so the difference is more obvious?

This doesn’t explain why topics don’t stay pinned for @mcwumbly? Did you change the pinned statuses manually?

1 лайк

Can we continue that discussion in the topic about that?

2 лайка

:thinking: Maybe he read them when automatically unpinning was still enabled. The index topics were created more than a year before automatic unpinning was disabled.

3 лайка